Aircraft like the Tu-154 and VC-10 have a "point" on the T-tail, while others like the 727 do not. Is this structure a shock body, or otherwise related to the tail's aerodynamics? And why is it only found on some designs?
-
2$\begingroup$ I am somewhat confident this was already discussed, but the search being what it is I can't find it now. $\endgroup$– Jan HudecCommented May 17, 2020 at 20:48
-
$\begingroup$ @JanHudec I had hoped I could find a post (here or elsewhere) discussing the design but I came up empty. I may be using the wrong terms to search with, though. $\endgroup$– zymhanCommented May 17, 2020 at 21:41
-
$\begingroup$ Related: aviation.stackexchange.com/questions/56900/… aviation.stackexchange.com/questions/26234/… aviation.stackexchange.com/questions/22237/… $\endgroup$– user-781943Commented May 18, 2020 at 4:18
-
$\begingroup$ @gszavae, the first one is basically duplicate (but now there is an answer here that's better than the accepted one there), the second is somewhat related, the third is not related at all. $\endgroup$– Jan HudecCommented May 18, 2020 at 5:38
-
5$\begingroup$ Does this answer your question? What is the aerodynamic purpose of an Acorn? $\endgroup$– Peter SchillingCommented May 18, 2020 at 6:58
2 Answers
It's a "bullet fairing". Sometimes you get the pressure fields of the vertical and horizontal surfaces in alignment so the lowest pressure zone of the vertical fin is merged with the lowest pressure zone of the horizontal tail right at the intersection of the surfaces. It results in a more extreme pressure recovery aft and can cause flow separation and vibration, and sometimes shock wave effects at high speed.
The bullet effectively moves the pressure field of the vertical surface forward to bring it out of alignment with the one of the horizontal surface. It's usually an add on resulting from interference issues that are discovered in the wind tunnel, or during flight testing.
In some aircraft, that protruding spike houses the high frequency comm antenna and its tuning mechanism. In others it contains parts of the elevator angle-of-attack control mechanism.
-
3$\begingroup$ Neither is reason for adding it though. They are just uses for the space when it is available. $\endgroup$ Commented May 17, 2020 at 20:43
-
$\begingroup$ So, the space isn't designed on purpose, engineers just might put stuff in it "when it is available"? (Because sometimes it is available, and other times, not?) That doesn't make any sense... $\endgroup$ Commented May 18, 2020 at 3:18
-
3$\begingroup$ @MichaelHall, yes, engineers just put stuff in wherever it fits. They decide on what volume and weight they want for the intended mission, then design the shape to be aerodynamically efficient and then lay out the stuff where it fits. So if they add a bullet fairing for aerodynamic reason, they'll take advantage of it to put some communication equipment there, but if not, they'll stuff it somewhere else. The antenna will probably still go in the tail, but it's not as big and the electronics will just go somewhere else, connected with suitable shielded cable. $\endgroup$ Commented May 18, 2020 at 5:43
-
3$\begingroup$ @MichaelHall you misunderstood. That protrusion is designed for a specific purpose, but that purpose is not to actually create some space, but rather to move a pressure field. Once that solution to move a pressure field was implemented and created some space as a side-effect engineers next determined what to put into that space now that it exists. $\endgroup$– DreamerCommented May 18, 2020 at 9:41