4
$\begingroup$

Why do two similar planes with the same engine have such different performance? For example, the Ikarus C42 and the Eurofox both use 912UL engines, but the Eurofox cruises 15 - 20 knots faster.

What factors contribute to this?

$\endgroup$
5
  • $\begingroup$ Do you have a source about the powerplant and the maximum speed of the Eurofox? According to the official website, the Eurofox can be powered by a Rotax rated either 80, 100, 115 or even 141hp but the relevant max speed is not given. For the Ikarus those values are listed but without the correct couple powerplant/max speed of the Eurofox, any answer would merely be speculative... $\endgroup$
    – sophit
    Commented Aug 8 at 21:23
  • $\begingroup$ @sophit the Eurofox POH (available on their website) states speeds for each engine. I am talking about the 80HP 912UL (not the "s") - as that's what the C42 has $\endgroup$
    – Cloud
    Commented Aug 9 at 8:24
  • $\begingroup$ Do you have a link? $\endgroup$
    – sophit
    Commented Aug 9 at 11:28
  • $\begingroup$ @sophit I googled "Eurofox POH" for you - bottom of this page: eurofoxaviation.co.uk/factory-built-microlight $\endgroup$
    – Cloud
    Commented Aug 9 at 11:41
  • $\begingroup$ Perfect, thanks 🙂 $\endgroup$
    – sophit
    Commented Aug 9 at 13:22

1 Answer 1

9
$\begingroup$

Wing loading -- mostly wing area because these aircraft have essentially the same gross weight.

The Ikarus has almost a 20% larger wing.

For these aircraft, the drag polars will be substantially similar. Importantly, the lift coefficient for best L/D will be about the same. This means that the cruise lift coefficients will be about equal.

The definition of lift coefficient in level flight:

$C_L=\frac{W}{q\,S}$

Can be re-arranged

$V=\sqrt{\frac{2}{\rho}\frac{W}{S}\frac{1}{C_L}}$

Dividing this expression by itself (but applied to airplanes 1 and 2), then cancelling all the constant terms.

$\frac{V_2}{V_1}=\sqrt{\frac{S_1}{S_2}}$

Plugging in numbers...

$109\times\sqrt{\frac{135}{112.5}}=119$

Which is pretty close to the 120 claimed.

I would expect the Ikarus to have better stall speed, takeoff distance, and landing distance -- unless the Eurofox uses more sophisticated high lift devices.

Note, the Wikipedia article for the Eurofox has a metric to standard conversion error on the wing area. Correct value used above. 10.45 m^2 is 112.5 ft^2.

$\endgroup$
4
  • $\begingroup$ Thanks Rob. Is the wing size on line 2 a typo? Does the C42 have a smaller wingspan? $\endgroup$
    – Cloud
    Commented Aug 9 at 8:25
  • $\begingroup$ @Cloud Line 2 of what? The wing areas I saw on Wikipedia were 135 for the Ikarus and 112.5 for the Eurofox. That is a ratio of 1.2. Bigger wing, lighter wing loading, slower airplane. $\endgroup$ Commented Aug 9 at 16:04
  • $\begingroup$ So the larger the wing ratio, the slower the plane? $\endgroup$
    – Cloud
    Commented Aug 12 at 8:44
  • $\begingroup$ All else being equal, the larger the wing, the slower the plane. In these equations, S is the wing area. W is the gross weight. W/S is the wing loading -- since S is on the bottom of wing loading, it behaves opposite. Light wing loading (small W and big S) is for slow airplanes. High wing loading (large W and small S) is for fast airplanes. $\endgroup$ Commented Aug 12 at 16:15

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .