9
$\begingroup$

Air Force One, just ahead of where the wing joins, has a silver "swoosh" on the bottom of the fuselage:

enter image description here

Air Force Two, or other congressional aircraft painted with the blue/white livery that I was able to find do not have that same feature:

enter image description here

What is the purpose of this "Silver Swoosh"? I was bale to identify the following two paths of reasoning, which raise additional questions:

Option 1: Part of the Paint Job

  • If the silver is just part of the paint job, why don't other congressional aircraft have that same feature?
  • If it is part of the paint job, what does it signify or what drives its inclusion?

Option 2: It fulfills a defensive function

  • What defensive purpose does it fulfill?
  • Since it seems to be highly reflective, does it potentially serve as a mirror for missiles with certain seeker heads?
$\endgroup$

3 Answers 3

12
$\begingroup$

It's just for looks; an area of unpainted aluminum, polished.

In this close up you can make out the rivet lines and skin laps of the bare aluminum surface. With a little work it's easy to get a finish like chrome plate, especially on a queen of the sky like that.

enter image description here

Back during American's natural finish paint scheme days, 80% of the fuselage was unpainted and polished. AF1 just does it on a little patch so it's like a chrome accent.

There was significant weight saving in AA's case, but they finally gave in and painted their entire airplanes because the polishing has to be done regularly and is a pain, and over time the polishing, on an airplane that spends a lot of time outside and constantly re-oxidizes, slowly removes the pure aluminum cladding of the metal that is its corrosion protection.

Vinyl wrap is now starting to become common on airliners, and in theory you could probably do that sort of accent today with "chrome look" vinyl wrap, but AF1 has had that paint job for decades.

enter image description here

$\endgroup$
6
  • $\begingroup$ They are the queens of the Air Force ^^ $\endgroup$
    – Peter
    Commented Apr 23, 2019 at 20:53
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Not doubting you, just curious on your source for this. As it stands, this is "a guy on the internet said..." $\endgroup$
    – FreeMan
    Commented Mar 16, 2021 at 18:13
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ My only source is "been in aviation for 40 years and it's obvious". But you have a point, so I added a close up and some context. $\endgroup$
    – John K
    Commented Mar 17, 2021 at 2:16
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ I used to really like the way those "natural" AA planes looked. $\endgroup$
    – davidbak
    Commented Nov 2, 2022 at 13:14
  • $\begingroup$ Plain aluminium was common on freighters..The Flying Tigers and Northwest B747Fs didnt have much paint on them. They were shiny ex-factory but the planes were too busy flying and they looked pretty rough after a few years. $\endgroup$
    – Anilv
    Commented May 22, 2023 at 4:13
10
$\begingroup$

As a follow up to this, it is just part of the paint/decoration. Polished aluminum.

This pic is directly over my house. They use the local airport for training, on a monthly basis.

enter image description here

(Image taken by me, directly over my house.)

$\endgroup$
2
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ At first I thought this adds nothing new to the older answer, but actually the picture attached does convincingly display the whole aesthetic composition the "swoosh" is a part of. +1 for that. $\endgroup$
    – Jpe61
    Commented Nov 6, 2021 at 16:59
  • $\begingroup$ Agree with @Jpe61 ... picture worth 1,000 words, this is to me the more convincing answer. $\endgroup$
    – Ralph J
    Commented Nov 7, 2021 at 4:03
9
$\begingroup$

The 747-based Air Force One (VC-25A) uses the livery that was first used on the 707-based Air Force One (VC-137) shown below (wiki commons photo).

enter image description here

The polished aluminum area that you observed on the 747-based Air Force One, appearing as a "swoosh", can be seen as it was originally designed for the 707 AF1 (VC-137), with the polished area more clearly continuing all the way to the tail of the aircraft. On the 747 AF1 the polished aluminum is interrupted by the painted aerodynamic wing-root fairing, making it appear as a "swoosh".

As a result of aerodynamics expertise increasing toward the end of the 1960s when the Boeing 747 was being designed, Boeing designed an aerodynamic fairing to smooth the turbulent airflow at the wing root where the wings attach to the body.

During the development of the 757 and 767 in the very late 1970s Boeing decided to utilize composite materials in order to save weight on light aerodynamic components like flight controls and fairings... eventually Boeing applied this weight saving technology to the wing-to-body fairing of the 747.

Because composite components cannot be polished to a shiny luster like aluminum can, Boeing paints these parts grey.

The "swoosh" on the 747 AF1 is a result of the polished area (which is uninterrupted on the 707 AF1) being interrupted by the painted composite wing-to-body fairing.

Regarding the 757 (C-32A) livery which lacks the polished metal aspect of the 747, it may have been omitted due to the C-32 not having the specific primary role of transporting the President. The C-32 is intended to carry the Vice President, the first lady, and the secretary of state. Other members of the president's Cabinet and members of Congress have flown aboard the C-32A, as has the president when traveling on short domestic trips where the range or capacity of the 747 is not required or the runway is not long enough to accommodate a 747.

Perhaps the most likely explanation for the 757 not having a polished metal area is that it takes too much manpower to keep the bare metal areas of the two 747s polished and looking good for the cameras.

$\endgroup$
1
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ this is purely a joke but it is likely because of the Nike Air Force One brand because there is no Nike Air Force 2 brand so the only one with a swoosh is Air Force One as it was the only one designed by Nike. $\endgroup$ Commented May 22, 2023 at 2:39

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .