Skip to main content
replaced http://aviation.stackexchange.com/ with https://aviation.stackexchange.com/
Source Link

This answeranswer suggests the FPV is aimed ahead of the ship. But it doesn't make sense.

enter image description here

(Picture from linked answer.)

A runway running away at 25 knots, is the same as a stationary runway plus 25 knots headwind.

The relative ground speed is the same, i.e., the rate of closure, and the glide-slope is consistent. Shouldn't the FPV be targeted at the touchdown zone?

Perhaps a bit to starboard, toward the island bridge, because that runway is crabbed. What am I missing?

This answer suggests the FPV is aimed ahead of the ship. But it doesn't make sense.

enter image description here

(Picture from linked answer.)

A runway running away at 25 knots, is the same as a stationary runway plus 25 knots headwind.

The relative ground speed is the same, i.e., the rate of closure, and the glide-slope is consistent. Shouldn't the FPV be targeted at the touchdown zone?

Perhaps a bit to starboard, toward the island bridge, because that runway is crabbed. What am I missing?

This answer suggests the FPV is aimed ahead of the ship. But it doesn't make sense.

enter image description here

(Picture from linked answer.)

A runway running away at 25 knots, is the same as a stationary runway plus 25 knots headwind.

The relative ground speed is the same, i.e., the rate of closure, and the glide-slope is consistent. Shouldn't the FPV be targeted at the touchdown zone?

Perhaps a bit to starboard, toward the island bridge, because that runway is crabbed. What am I missing?

deleted 46 characters in body
Source Link
user14897
user14897

This answer suggests the FPV is aimed ahead of the ship. But it doesn't make sense.

enter image description here

Picture from linked answer.(Picture from linked answer.)

A runway running away from me at 25 knots, no pun intended, is the same as a stationary runway plus 25 knots headwind.

The relative ground speed is the same, i.e., the rate of closure, and the glide-slope is consistent. Shouldn't the FPV be targeted at the touchdown zone?

Perhaps a bit to starboard, toward the island bridge, because that runway is crabbed, but the FPV should remain on deck. What am I missing?

This answer suggests the FPV is aimed ahead of the ship. But it doesn't make sense.

enter image description here

Picture from linked answer.

A runway running away from me at 25 knots, no pun intended, is the same as a stationary runway plus 25 knots headwind.

The relative ground speed is the same, i.e. the rate of closure, and the glide-slope is consistent. Shouldn't the FPV be targeted at the touchdown zone?

Perhaps a bit to starboard, toward the island bridge, because that runway is crabbed, but the FPV should remain on deck. What am I missing?

This answer suggests the FPV is aimed ahead of the ship. But it doesn't make sense.

enter image description here

(Picture from linked answer.)

A runway running away at 25 knots, is the same as a stationary runway plus 25 knots headwind.

The relative ground speed is the same, i.e., the rate of closure, and the glide-slope is consistent. Shouldn't the FPV be targeted at the touchdown zone?

Perhaps a bit to starboard, toward the island bridge, because that runway is crabbed. What am I missing?

Tweeted twitter.com/StackAviation/status/749206918464409600
deleted 4 characters in body
Source Link
user14897
user14897

This answer suggests the FPV is aimed ahead of the ship. But it doesn't make sense.

enter image description here

Picture from linked answer.

A runway running away from me at 25 knots, no pun intended, is the same as a stationary runway plus 25 knots headwind.

The relative ground speed is the same, i.e. the rate of closure, and the glide-slope is consistent. Shouldn't the FPV be targeted at the touchdown zone?

Perhaps a bit to the port sidestarboard, toward the island bridge, because that runway is crabbed, but the FPV should remain on deck. What am I missing?

This answer suggests the FPV is aimed ahead of the ship. But it doesn't make sense.

enter image description here

Picture from linked answer.

A runway running away from me at 25 knots, no pun intended, is the same as a stationary runway plus 25 knots headwind.

The relative ground speed is the same, i.e. the rate of closure, and the glide-slope is consistent. Shouldn't the FPV be targeted at the touchdown zone?

Perhaps a bit to the port side, toward the island bridge, because that runway is crabbed, but the FPV should remain on deck. What am I missing?

This answer suggests the FPV is aimed ahead of the ship. But it doesn't make sense.

enter image description here

Picture from linked answer.

A runway running away from me at 25 knots, no pun intended, is the same as a stationary runway plus 25 knots headwind.

The relative ground speed is the same, i.e. the rate of closure, and the glide-slope is consistent. Shouldn't the FPV be targeted at the touchdown zone?

Perhaps a bit to starboard, toward the island bridge, because that runway is crabbed, but the FPV should remain on deck. What am I missing?

added 2 characters in body
Source Link
user14897
user14897
Loading
Source Link
user14897
user14897
Loading