10
$\begingroup$

Every time I have flown and filed flight plans the CFI or the person I have rented the plane from has told me what equipment code to put on the flight plan. I am curious how you would figure out on your own. Is it in the POH?

$\endgroup$
2
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ FAA or ICAO flight plans? (The formats are different.) $\endgroup$
    – Lnafziger
    Commented Feb 15, 2016 at 22:38
  • $\begingroup$ I don't like link-only answers, but Wikipedia has a great answer to this question en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Equipment_codes $\endgroup$
    – rbp
    Commented Feb 15, 2016 at 23:52

1 Answer 1

8
$\begingroup$

Basically you know what equipment is installed on the aircraft (and in working order), and that's what you enter on the form.

For FAA flight plans, there's a list in the AIM (It's table 5-1-3).
Generally for domestic flight plans you file the "best" equipment you have onboard in working order.

FAA "Domestic" flight plans are eventually going away though, and we'll be expected to use the ICAO flight plan format (including its equipment codes).
ICAO equipment codes are a little more complicated because the "Equipment" box lets you list a whole lot more stuff (and the more you enter the more ATC knows in the event of an emergency): Basically you list all the equipment you have in working order under the equipment box on the ICAO flight plan form.
Lists of ICAO equipment codes is available (the one on Wikipedia is pretty complete), and there are handy wizards floating around that let you check boxes and get the string you need to enter on the flight plan.


Look at two hypothetical aircraft, both identical Cessna 172s with different equipment to see how it works:

  • Aircraft #1 has a VHF Nav/Com (VOR only, no ILS), DME, GPS, and Mode C transponder.
    This aircraft would file /G on a domestic flight plan, and DGOV/C on an ICAO flight plan (the ICAO flight plan may also include R and an appropriate PBN code for the GPS capability).

  • Aircraft #2 has a VHF Nav/Com with ILS capability, and a Mode C transponder.
    This aircraft would file /U on a domestic flight plan, and SV/C on an ICAO flight plan.

Note that the ICAO flight plan gives ATC more information to work with:
If Aircraft #1 calls up and says their GPS died ATC knows they can assign them clearances that use VORs and DME for navigation, but that the aircraft cannot accept an ILS approach at their destination.
Conversely if working off a domestic flight plan ATC will have to ask the pilot what their navigation capabilities are (or they may assume "standard" equipment including an glideslope receiver and ILS capability and offer the pilot an ILS approach only to be told "Unable ILS" by the pilot).

$\endgroup$
5
  • $\begingroup$ Could the pilot of Aircraft #1 fly a LOC approach? $\endgroup$ Commented Feb 16, 2016 at 1:38
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ @UnrecognizedFallingObject No, you must have an ILS receiver to fly a LOC approach (not even WAAS allows you to fly a LOC approach). $\endgroup$
    – Lnafziger
    Commented Feb 16, 2016 at 3:53
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ It isn't just in the even of an emergency: They use the equipment codes to know what kind of arrivals and approaches they can assign to you (for instance, RNAV 1 SIDs and STARs, etc.) $\endgroup$
    – Lnafziger
    Commented Feb 16, 2016 at 3:53
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ Even worse, aircraft #1 simply can't fly ILS or LOC approach at all and the domestic flight plan gives no indication of it. So even without emergency ATC is likely to offer ILS approach just to get "unable ILS" back (of course, VHF Nav without ILS capability is probably quite rare). $\endgroup$
    – Jan Hudec
    Commented Feb 16, 2016 at 7:12
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @JanHudec I've never seen it, and the particular combo of equipment I gave would be very unlikely (DME without ILS? Witchcraft!). Something like a single Garmin GPS/Com unit and a transponder would give you /G by way of GV/C though -- a plane that couldn't even do VOR navigation if its GPS died - you'd be reduced to radar vectors to someplace VFR, or a surveillance radar approach! $\endgroup$
    – voretaq7
    Commented Feb 16, 2016 at 7:24

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .