Skip to main content
clarify and add content to footnote
Source Link
quiet flyer
  • 23k
  • 5
  • 47
  • 136
  1. All LAANC screenshots taken on 2-1-21

  2. As of 2-1-21 this link to an on-line portrayal of the aviation sectional chart covering PASI still showed the airspace as it was configured before a recent change that came into effect 11-5-20. It appears that the 11/5/20 edition of the Juneau sectional chart has not yet actually been made available on-line (see non-working links for Juneau sectional on the FAA's "VFR Raster Charts" page.) The new configuration of the airspace at PASI, which involves ana (nearly circular) E2 Class-E-to-surface area and ana single, very large, rectangular E4 Class-E-to-surface extension, may be seen by selecting the appropriate layers on the LAANC map display after entering "PASI" into the search window. The airspace configuration at PASI therefore is now similar to the airspace configuration at KACV and KTLV, as described in the related ASE question What is the primary reason that the non-towered airports ACV, TVL, SGU, BIH, and SIT/PASI have E4 extensions to E2 airspace? .

  1. All LAANC screenshots taken on 2-1-21

  2. As of 2-1-21 this link to an on-line portrayal of the aviation sectional chart covering PASI still showed the airspace as it was configured before a recent change that came into effect 11-5-20. It appears that the 11/5/20 edition of the Juneau sectional chart has not yet actually been made available on-line (see non-working links for Juneau sectional on the FAA's "VFR Raster Charts" page.) The new configuration of the airspace at PASI, which involves an E2 Class-E-to-surface area and an E4 Class-E-to-surface extension, may be seen by selecting the appropriate layers on the LAANC map display after entering "PASI" into the search window. The airspace configuration at PASI therefore is now similar to the airspace configuration at KACV and KTLV, as described in the related ASE question What is the primary reason that the non-towered airports ACV, TVL, SGU, BIH, and SIT/PASI have E4 extensions to E2 airspace? .

  1. All LAANC screenshots taken on 2-1-21

  2. As of 2-1-21 this link to an on-line portrayal of the aviation sectional chart covering PASI still showed the airspace as it was configured before a recent change that came into effect 11-5-20. It appears that the 11/5/20 edition of the Juneau sectional chart has not yet actually been made available on-line (see non-working links for Juneau sectional on the FAA's "VFR Raster Charts" page.) The new configuration of the airspace at PASI, which involves a (nearly circular) E2 Class-E-to-surface area and a single, very large, rectangular E4 Class-E-to-surface extension, may be seen by selecting the appropriate layers on the LAANC map display after entering "PASI" into the search window. The airspace configuration at PASI therefore is now similar to the airspace configuration at KACV and KTLV, as described in the related ASE question What is the primary reason that the non-towered airports ACV, TVL, SGU, BIH, and SIT/PASI have E4 extensions to E2 airspace? .

add link and other content to footnote
Source Link
quiet flyer
  • 23k
  • 5
  • 47
  • 136
  1. All LAANC screenshots taken on 2-1-21

  2. As of 2-1-21 this link forto an on-line portrayal of the aviation sectional chart tocovering PASI still showed the airspace as it was configured before a recent change that came into effect 11-5-20. It appears that the 11/5/20 edition of the Juneau sectional chart has not yet actually been made available on-line (see non-working links for Juneau sectional on the FAA's "VFR Raster Charts" page.) The new configuration of the airspace at PASI, which involves an E2 Class-E-to-surface area and an E4 Class-E-to-surface extension, may be seen by selecting the appropriate layers on the LAANC map display after entering "PASI" into the search window. The airspace configuration at PASI therefore is now similar to the airspace configuration at KACV and KTLV, as described in the related ASE question What is the primary reason that the non-towered airports ACV, TVL, SGU, BIH, and SIT/PASI have E4 extensions to E2 airspace? .

  1. All LAANC screenshots taken on 2-1-21

  2. As of 2-1-21 this link for the sectional chart to PASI still showed the airspace as it was configured before a recent change that came into effect 11-5-20. The new configuration of the airspace at PASI, which involves an E2 Class-E-to-surface area and an E4 Class-E-to-surface extension, may be seen by selecting the appropriate layers on the LAANC map display after entering "PASI" into the search window. The airspace configuration at PASI therefore is now similar to the airspace configuration at KACV and KTLV, as described in the related ASE question What is the primary reason that the non-towered airports ACV, TVL, SGU, BIH, and SIT/PASI have E4 extensions to E2 airspace? .

  1. All LAANC screenshots taken on 2-1-21

  2. As of 2-1-21 this link to an on-line portrayal of the aviation sectional chart covering PASI still showed the airspace as it was configured before a recent change that came into effect 11-5-20. It appears that the 11/5/20 edition of the Juneau sectional chart has not yet actually been made available on-line (see non-working links for Juneau sectional on the FAA's "VFR Raster Charts" page.) The new configuration of the airspace at PASI, which involves an E2 Class-E-to-surface area and an E4 Class-E-to-surface extension, may be seen by selecting the appropriate layers on the LAANC map display after entering "PASI" into the search window. The airspace configuration at PASI therefore is now similar to the airspace configuration at KACV and KTLV, as described in the related ASE question What is the primary reason that the non-towered airports ACV, TVL, SGU, BIH, and SIT/PASI have E4 extensions to E2 airspace? .

add link
Source Link
quiet flyer
  • 23k
  • 5
  • 47
  • 136
  1. All LAANC screenshots taken on 2-1-21

  2. As of 2-1-21 this link for the sectional chart to PASI still showed the airspace as it was configured before a recent change that came into effect 11-5-20. The new configuration of the airspace at PASI, which involves an E2 Class-E-to-surface area and an E4 Class-E-to-surface extension, may be seen by selecting the appropriate layers on the LAANC map displayLAANC map display after entering "PASI" into the search window. The airspace configuration at PASI therefore is now similar to the airspace configuration at KACV and KTLV, as described in the related ASE question What is the primary reason that the non-towered airports ACV, TVL, SGU, BIH, and SIT/PASI have E4 extensions to E2 airspace? .

  1. All LAANC screenshots taken on 2-1-21

  2. As of 2-1-21 this link for the sectional chart to PASI still showed the airspace as it was configured before a recent change that came into effect 11-5-20. The new configuration of the airspace at PASI, which involves an E2 Class-E-to-surface area and an E4 Class-E-to-surface extension, may be seen by selecting the appropriate layers on the LAANC map display after entering "PASI" into the search window. The airspace configuration at PASI therefore is now similar to the airspace configuration at KACV and KTLV, as described in the related ASE question What is the primary reason that the non-towered airports ACV, TVL, SGU, BIH, and SIT/PASI have E4 extensions to E2 airspace? .

  1. All LAANC screenshots taken on 2-1-21

  2. As of 2-1-21 this link for the sectional chart to PASI still showed the airspace as it was configured before a recent change that came into effect 11-5-20. The new configuration of the airspace at PASI, which involves an E2 Class-E-to-surface area and an E4 Class-E-to-surface extension, may be seen by selecting the appropriate layers on the LAANC map display after entering "PASI" into the search window. The airspace configuration at PASI therefore is now similar to the airspace configuration at KACV and KTLV, as described in the related ASE question What is the primary reason that the non-towered airports ACV, TVL, SGU, BIH, and SIT/PASI have E4 extensions to E2 airspace? .

added 6 characters in body
Source Link
quiet flyer
  • 23k
  • 5
  • 47
  • 136
Loading
increase accuracy of footnote after further research
Source Link
quiet flyer
  • 23k
  • 5
  • 47
  • 136
Loading
clarify
Source Link
quiet flyer
  • 23k
  • 5
  • 47
  • 136
Loading
correct and clarify
Source Link
quiet flyer
  • 23k
  • 5
  • 47
  • 136
Loading
added links
Source Link
quiet flyer
  • 23k
  • 5
  • 47
  • 136
Loading
added images
Source Link
quiet flyer
  • 23k
  • 5
  • 47
  • 136
Loading
added images
Source Link
quiet flyer
  • 23k
  • 5
  • 47
  • 136
Loading
added link
Source Link
quiet flyer
  • 23k
  • 5
  • 47
  • 136
Loading
added 28 characters in body
Source Link
quiet flyer
  • 23k
  • 5
  • 47
  • 136
Loading
Source Link
quiet flyer
  • 23k
  • 5
  • 47
  • 136
Loading