Skip to main content
Aviation

Return to Question

Became Hot Network Question
Tweeted twitter.com/StackAviation/status/1170441760729968640
Changed the title to match a more generic version of this question to improve indexing. Added FAA tag.
Link
Ryan Mortensen
Ryan Mortensen
  • 9.1k
  • 1
  • 40
  • 102

Why is Muskogeewould an airport be depicted with symbology for runways longer than 80698,069 feet even though it is reported on the sectional as 72007,200 feet?

Source Link
Ryan Mortensen
Ryan Mortensen
  • 9.1k
  • 1
  • 40
  • 102

Why is Muskogee airport depicted with symbology for runways longer than 8069 feet even though it is reported on the sectional as 7200 feet?

This airport, KMKO, Muskogee-Davis Regional in Oklahoma southeast of Tulsa is depicted on the sectional chart with symbology normally reserved for airport with a hard surfaced runway longer than 8069 feet, but this one is only reported on the sectional as 7200.

Is this a mistake by the FAA or is there some clear explanation about why this is?

enter image description here