# In what scenario would a "climb, crossing climb" or "descend, crossing descend" be issued by a TCAS system?

"CLIMB, CROSSING CLIMB, CLIMB CROSSING CLIMB"

"DESCEND, CROSSING DESCEND, DESCEND CROSSING DESCEND"

In what situation would a TCAS system advise a climb or descent thorough another aircraft's altitude, rather than issuing a command to climb or descend away from the intruding aircraft's altitude?

FlightGear's (sim) wiki page gives an example of such a command for where the an aircraft at a lower altitude is already is climbing, and/or the aircraft at a higher altitude already is descending. But I struggle fully understand this example, wouldn't the TCAS simply issue a climb command for the descending and a descend command for the climbing as the safer option (granted - there will be inertia lags with the heavy jets). Or rather issue an "INCREASE DESCEND, INCREASE DESCEND" / "INCREASE CLIMB, INCREASE CLIMB." Furthermore, how can the TCAS system presume that descending/climbing aircraft will maintain its rate of descent/climb?

When a TCAS RA is issued, the system first selects the sense (up or down) and then the required strength. During the sense decision, an altitude crossing is avoided if the required vertical separation is sufficient:

The first step is to select the sense (upward or downward avoidance) of the RA. Using the results of the vertical and horizontal tracking, the logic models the intruder’s path to the CPA. [...] The CAS logic computes the predicted vertical separation for each of the two cases and normally selects the sense, which provides the greater vertical distance.

In the cases where an altitude crossing is projected before the CPA, the CAS logic will pick the sense that avoids crossing, provided that the resulting vertical distance at CPA is sufficient.

Figure 19 illustrates this case. The desired amount of vertical safe distance (ALIM), varies from 300 to 700 feet, depending on own aircraft’s altitude regime. If ALIM cannot be achieved, a crossing RA will be issued (see Figure 20). However, delaying mechanisms aim at reducing the incidence of crossing RAs by deferring an altitude crossing advisory if:

• one aircraft is level, or when the two aircraft have vertical rates in opposite senses and they are separated by at least 600 feet; or
• when both aircraft have a vertical rate in the same sense and they are separated by at least 850 feet.

A resolution advisory is altitude crossing if own ACAS aircraft is currently at least 100 feet below or above the threat aircraft for upward or downward sense advisories, respectively.

(Eurocontrol - ACAS Guide - Airborne Collision Avoidance, emphasis mine)

Figure 20 illustrates the case where the separation for non-crossing (vertical distance at B) is below the minimum desired value (illustrated by the black arrow). In that case, a crossing RA will be issued with "Descend, crossing descend; descend, crossing descend".

Furthermore, how can the TCAS system presume that descending/climbing aircraft will maintain its rate of descent/climb?

The TCAS will always presume that the intruder maintains their current flight profile. This works if the other aircraft does not have TCAS or if the other aircraft is maneuvering such that the vertical separation is even increased.

For crossing RAs, this can however result in a situation, where the other aircraft maneuvers such that the vertical separation is reduced. This will then trigger a modified RA: