17
$\begingroup$

What are the material types account for most of the empty weight of an airplane (Boeing 747), besides aluminum or its alloys used in fuselage?

$\endgroup$
3
  • $\begingroup$ I would think the engines are rather beefy, but since you specifically mention aluminum are you looking for a breakdown by material type, or are actually looking for components, like 'engine', 'wing', 'landing gear'? $\endgroup$
    – FreeMan
    Commented Feb 27, 2015 at 19:13
  • $\begingroup$ I am looking for breakdown by material type $\endgroup$
    – Anon
    Commented Feb 27, 2015 at 19:15
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ On a lot of large aircraft, the answer would be fuel. (I realize that's not what you're asking) $\endgroup$
    – SSumner
    Commented Feb 27, 2015 at 22:06

2 Answers 2

27
$\begingroup$

Besides aluminum alloys, most of an airplane's weight is steel, titanium, and composites. Here is a chart comparing the 747 and 777 structural weight, with a breakdown typical for similar airliners:

747 and 777 materials breakdown
Source

Steel is used in components where strength or part life is most important, like landing gear and other important structural elements, as well as many fasteners. Titanium is used where weight and high temperature are important, such as around the engines. Composites are traditionally used for many less-structural applications such as panels and fairings, but may also be used in the empennage (tail surfaces) or on the interior as floor beams. Other materials will include alloys like nickel, as well as specialty materials like rubber, plastic, and fabric, which are used mostly in the cabin.

New aircraft like the 787 and A350 use composites much more extensively, replacing much of the aluminum. Titanium is also used more in these aircraft because it does not tend to corrode in contact with carbon fiber composite like aluminum does.

787 materials breakdown
Source

Federico pointed out that the two graphics differ in the amount of aluminum on the 777 (70% on the first vs. 50% on the second), because the first chart shows only structural weight, while the second is overall.

$\endgroup$
7
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ I note that the 777 stats differ significantly between your top right pie chart and the lower right "By comparison" text inset. $\endgroup$ Commented Feb 27, 2015 at 22:12
  • $\begingroup$ @Timbo Yes, I'm not sure why that is. $\endgroup$
    – fooot
    Commented Feb 27, 2015 at 22:34
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ because the first image caption says "structural materials mass distribution", I the understand that all non-structural components (e.g., wing surfaces) are not included $\endgroup$
    – Federico
    Commented Feb 28, 2015 at 17:07
  • $\begingroup$ @Federico good observation, but I'm not quite convinced that the 777 has 11% weight in structural composites. $\endgroup$
    – fooot
    Commented Feb 28, 2015 at 17:19
  • $\begingroup$ nap.edu/openbook.php?record_id=11424&page=12 and here: dailyreckoning.com.au/… "The cabin floor and floor supports, as well as vertical fin and horizontal stabilizers in the rear, are made out of carbon-fiber reinforced plastic." $\endgroup$
    – Federico
    Commented Feb 28, 2015 at 17:27
6
$\begingroup$

A general breakdown by material type isn't really useful (or possible) because the heaviest components of most aircraft are composed of multiple materials, and not all aircraft are built of the same materials.

The heaviest component of most airplanes is the fuselage. This is predominantly aluminum, but possibly composite in newer aircraft (Cirrus SR-22, Boeing 787), and some aircraft have multiple materials used (e.g. Mooneys have an aluminum skin, but a steel frame/cage, and "tube-and-fabric" airplanes use cloth and dope stretched over a (typically steel) frame).
While the alloy (or composite) used for the fuselage is probably relatively light compared to say a car's frame & body it's usually the largest part of an aircraft, and thus the heaviest.

The number two component on an airplane is the engine (or engines) -- the engine may even be the heaviest component of some aircraft (Ultralights and some tube-and-fabric aircraft).
As with the fuselage an engine is often comprised of multiple metal alloy: crank shafts and cams tend to be steel, lifter faces are often cast iron, the crankcase tends to be aluminum, pistons are usually both (a steel barrel mated to an aluminum head), and various alloys are used in bearings and valve guides.


As an example if we look at a Piper Cub the heaviest alloy is probably steel (the fuselage tubing, crankcase, and camshaft are all steel). Number two is probably aluminum (the engine crankcase, pistons, and cylinder heads are aluminum, as are the wing ribs and possibly the spars). Number three might be wood (if the spars were never converted to aluminum), but is more likely the fabric (and dope/paint) used to cover the fuselage.

As a different example, consider the de Haviland Mosquito: The heaviest component of this aircraft is unquestionably wood (as the aircraft is constructed almost entirely of wood), and the number two item is probably aluminum or iron (from the engines & propellers).

$\endgroup$
0

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .