Stack Exchange network consists of 183 Q&A communities including Stack Overflow, the largest, most trusted online community for developers to learn, share their knowledge, and build their careers.
Is it because of the inherent limitations of cooling the cylinder walls, only 2 valves per cylinder, relative ease of scaling up instead of dialing up the boost, or some other reason?
EDIT: sorry typo, HP/LBS should be HP/L
Is it because of the inherent limitations of cooling the cylinder walls, only 2 valves per cylinder, relative ease of scaling up instead of dialing up the boost, or some other reason?
EDIT: sorry typo, HP/LBS should be HP/L
Is it because of the inherent limitations of cooling the cylinder walls, only 2 valves per cylinder, relative ease of scaling up instead of dialing up the boost, or some other reason?
What is the main reason of air-cooled radials producing much less HP/lbsL compared to liquid cooled Vs?
Is it because of the inherent limitations of cooling the cylinder walls, only 2 valves per cylinder, relative ease of scaling up instead of dialing up the boost, or some other reason?
EDIT: sorry typo, HP/LBS should be HP/L
What is the main reason of air-cooled radials producing much less HP/lbs compared to liquid cooled Vs?
Is it because of the inherent limitations of cooling the cylinder walls, only 2 valves per cylinder, relative ease of scaling up instead of dialing up the boost, or some other reason?
What is the main reason of air-cooled radials producing much less HP/L compared to liquid cooled Vs?
Is it because of the inherent limitations of cooling the cylinder walls, only 2 valves per cylinder, relative ease of scaling up instead of dialing up the boost, or some other reason?
What is the main reason of air-cooled radials producing much less HP/lbs compared to liquid cooled Vs?
Is it because of the inherent limitations of cooling the cylinder walls, only 2 valves per cylinder, relative ease of scaling up instead of dialing up the boost, or some other reason?
