Skip to main content
9 events
when toggle format what by license comment
May 4, 2023 at 14:23 answer added randomhead timeline score: 3
Aug 23, 2018 at 6:01 history tweeted twitter.com/StackAviation/status/1032508091445772294
Aug 23, 2018 at 3:10 vote accept Devil07
Aug 22, 2018 at 21:22 comment added Devil07 Also, I think it was an airplane that usually lives in a hanger; it was shinier than the tie-down riffraff.
Aug 22, 2018 at 21:19 comment added Devil07 @MichaelKjörling I agree that is the only possible one that might apply. Although, like you said, with power at idle, riding the brakes at a crawl probably doesn't meet the level of careless or reckless. :)
Aug 22, 2018 at 21:16 comment added user How about "careless or reckless such as to endanger the life or property of another", or however exactly the regulation goes? Though I would argue you were likely neither careless nor reckless, but rather aware of the danger and taking appropriate steps to mitigate it, assuming of course that really nothing got damaged or hit. But next time, yeah, I'd suggest considering to just move the aircraft by hand power instead...
Aug 22, 2018 at 20:49 answer added guycole timeline score: 5
Aug 22, 2018 at 20:38 comment added Ron Beyer I don't believe there is any regulation for this on the FAA side. Just look at how close airliners get while taxiing around gates/push-back. Airlines may have company policies or airports may have policies, but that would be too broad to answer here (and you are asking about GA or small aircraft).
Aug 22, 2018 at 20:14 history asked Devil07 CC BY-SA 4.0