Timeline for For the elliptical wing, which property is actually elliptically distributed?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
12 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 11, 2017 at 14:21 | comment | added | DeltaLima♦ | For a moment I thought you deleted your answer and all the good references were gone. Thank you for editing your answer and putting it back in! By the way, we (@NoahKrasser and me) are not mods, we're just ordinary users like you. It's the combined effort of the community that makes this site great. | |
| Oct 11, 2017 at 13:17 | history | undeleted | Lysistrata | ||
| Oct 11, 2017 at 13:17 | history | edited | Lysistrata | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 313 characters in body
|
| Oct 11, 2017 at 13:03 | history | deleted | Lysistrata | via Vote | |
| Oct 11, 2017 at 12:59 | comment | added | DeltaLima♦ | @Lysistrata I understand you want to criticise Peter's answer, and I think that is fine. However, this is not a forum, it is a question & answer site. Each posted answer should in fact answer the question. Comments can be made under an answer to ask for clarification or to criticise. Since your comment is too big to be left in the comment field, the site's format causes a problem here. I am pretty sure that the community will (and I agree with that approach) vote to delete answers that are in fact comments, just to prevent this site to develop into a discussion forum. | |
| Oct 11, 2017 at 12:52 | comment | added | Noah Krasser | Welcome too, I have to agree with DeltaLima. It's not that your comment is bad, it's great, but the site rules don't allow this format. Please answer the original question in your post as well, to prevent your post from being deleted. It's just to make sure your post fits the community rules, because the community on stack-exchange is strict. | |
| Oct 11, 2017 at 12:43 | comment | added | Lysistrata | My comment is a criticism of Peter's answer, specifically regarding constant spanwise lift coefficient. (I have no problem with the other parts of his thoughtful answer.) I gave reasons for why I believe that part of his answer is incorrect, and I have cited appropriate references. I'm not sure that I can do much more than that. | |
| Oct 11, 2017 at 12:17 | review | Low quality posts | |||
| S Oct 11, 2017 at 13:04 | |||||
| Oct 11, 2017 at 12:12 | review | Late answers | |||
| S Oct 11, 2017 at 13:04 | |||||
| Oct 11, 2017 at 12:12 | comment | added | DeltaLima♦ | Hello Lysistrata, welcome to Aviation.stackexchange.com. I think your answer has great potential, but currently it is only a comment to Peter Kämpf's answer. Can you edit your post and answer the original question, thereby addressing where you think Peter's answer falls short? Otherwise it may be flagged as "comment to other post" and subsequently deleted. | |
| Oct 11, 2017 at 12:01 | review | First posts | |||
| Oct 11, 2017 at 12:14 | |||||
| Oct 11, 2017 at 11:57 | history | answered | Lysistrata | CC BY-SA 3.0 |