Timeline for What are the reasons behind switching FDs off for a VOR approach?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
12 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 1, 2017 at 17:53 | vote | accept | Jai | ||
| Aug 15, 2017 at 3:05 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/StackAviation/status/897293227518308353 | ||
| Aug 12, 2017 at 8:33 | comment | added | Radu094 | problem is you shoudln't really use the V/DEV as your primary/single guidance durring approach. DME vs. baro altitude is a good crosscheck that will give you the correct FPA to stay on descent profile. Converting FPA to VS is a bit too math intensive though... | |
| Aug 11, 2017 at 8:33 | answer | added | Radu094 | timeline score: 3 | |
| Aug 10, 2017 at 8:27 | review | Close votes | |||
| Aug 10, 2017 at 13:10 | |||||
| Aug 10, 2017 at 8:07 | history | edited | Jai | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 87 characters in body
|
| Aug 10, 2017 at 8:06 | comment | added | Jai | Okay I still quite don't get it ? Doesn't the V/DEV function help us manage our V/S? We are correcting our pitch angle there to and as a result thrust will change. My question pertains to when we disengage the AP. | |
| Aug 9, 2017 at 5:21 | comment | added | Jai | If we leave it on what effect will it have ? | |
| Aug 8, 2017 at 10:52 | history | edited | mins | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Slighly adjusted title question and body, added Airbus tag,
|
| Aug 8, 2017 at 9:26 | review | Low quality posts | |||
| Aug 8, 2017 at 10:52 | |||||
| Aug 8, 2017 at 9:25 | history | edited | Stelios Adamantidis | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Typo
|
| Aug 8, 2017 at 9:10 | history | asked | Jai | CC BY-SA 3.0 |