Skip to main content
12 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Apr 13, 2017 at 12:59 history edited CommunityBot
replaced http://aviation.stackexchange.com/ with https://aviation.stackexchange.com/
Sep 27, 2016 at 17:10 history protected CommunityBot
Oct 26, 2015 at 19:16 vote accept FreeMan
Oct 24, 2015 at 0:06 comment added reirab @alephzero The blade tips are traveling in a plane that is (mostly) perpendicular to the flow through the engine. It's true that the flow through the engine will usually (probably always in a non-scramjet) be subsonic, but that doesn't mean the blade tips are subsonic relative to the air in which they're traveling, since they're moving perpendicular to said flow. In order for the airspeed of the blade tips to be less than their rotational speed, the intake air would have to be rotating around the turbine axis before encountering the intake fan.
Oct 23, 2015 at 22:30 comment added alephzero The Mach 1.67 estimate is too high, because it ignores the fact that the airflow through the fan is constrained by the fan case. The speed difference between the blade tips and the air outside the fan case is irrelevant. The flow through the fan is indeed transonic in some situations, but the highest Mach number is much closer to 1.0 than to 1.67.
Oct 23, 2015 at 22:26 answer added alephzero timeline score: 10
Oct 23, 2015 at 18:02 history tweeted twitter.com/StackAviation/status/657618200868364288
Oct 23, 2015 at 16:20 answer added Robert Werner timeline score: 8
Oct 23, 2015 at 15:19 answer added aeroalias timeline score: 14
Oct 23, 2015 at 14:32 history edited FreeMan CC BY-SA 3.0
edited title
Oct 23, 2015 at 14:11 answer added Peter Kämpf timeline score: 28
Oct 23, 2015 at 13:46 history asked FreeMan CC BY-SA 3.0