Timeline for Could the Boeing 787-9 near vertical takeoff demonstration be performed by Airbus A350 aircraft?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
22 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 1, 2019 at 14:34 | history | edited | Rajdeep Singh | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
edited title
|
| S Mar 8, 2018 at 23:31 | history | suggested | John Wiseman | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Minor formatting and grammar fixes.
|
| Mar 8, 2018 at 22:58 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Mar 8, 2018 at 23:31 | |||||
| Apr 13, 2017 at 12:59 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://aviation.stackexchange.com/ with https://aviation.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Feb 2, 2017 at 8:00 | comment | added | kebs | @RSB On this video at 1m20s, it can be seen that the actual angle is more near 50°. | |
| Jul 5, 2016 at 9:53 | history | edited | DeltaLima♦ | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Improved the quality of the title of this post (http://meta.aviation.stackexchange.com/q/1485/19)
|
| Oct 24, 2015 at 4:43 | history | edited | Rajdeep Singh | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 6 characters in body
|
| Jun 23, 2015 at 8:59 | comment | added | Agent_L | The text you've quoted was pulled out of context. This "limiting in extreme situations" is made sounding like a bad thing. Read the bottom of that post. E.g. this limiting is what made miracle on the Hudson River easier for the pilot (he could just pull back the stick all the way and focus on looking for landing area - in Boeing he would have to pay attention to not pull back too hard). As everything in the world, some people find it good, other find it bad. As neither of us fly, it's not really our business to judge. | |
| Jun 23, 2015 at 7:15 | history | edited | Rajdeep Singh |
edited tags
|
|
| Jun 22, 2015 at 19:47 | comment | added | mins | Actual demonstration at Paris Air Show. The one included here was a rehearsal near Seattle. Looks great anyway. | |
| Jun 22, 2015 at 18:51 | answer | added | Adrien Nader | timeline score: 3 | |
| Jun 22, 2015 at 16:20 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/#!/StackAviation/status/613018742654636032 | ||
| Jun 22, 2015 at 12:11 | vote | accept | Rajdeep Singh | ||
| Jun 22, 2015 at 11:12 | comment | added | anshabhi | @RSB for the time, its my memory. I read it somewhere, that I don't remember.. | |
| Jun 22, 2015 at 9:20 | answer | added | Ben | timeline score: 41 | |
| Jun 22, 2015 at 9:17 | comment | added | Rajdeep Singh |
CNN prompted Boeing to "share specifics about the takeoff and banking angles during the flight." A company spokeswoman told CNN "we unfortunately aren't sharing specifics about the profile such as bank angles at this time." linkedin.com/pulse/…
|
|
| Jun 22, 2015 at 9:14 | comment | added | Rajdeep Singh | I do agree that its not 90 degrees, but can you mention the source that says it was 55 degrees? | |
| Jun 22, 2015 at 9:12 | comment | added | ratchet freak | Who wants to bet that the plane was at (near) operational empty weight. I doubt the plane could do that if at max takeoff weight. | |
| Jun 22, 2015 at 8:41 | history | edited | anshabhi | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
no need to tell that you are regular visitor of [Aviation.SE].
|
| Jun 22, 2015 at 8:39 | comment | added | anshabhi | The near vertical takeoff was actually at an angle of 55 degrees only. The video makes it look like vertical.. | |
| Jun 22, 2015 at 8:31 | review | First posts | |||
| Jun 22, 2015 at 8:34 | |||||
| Jun 22, 2015 at 8:29 | history | asked | Rajdeep Singh | CC BY-SA 3.0 |