Skip to main content
12 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Jan 13 at 20:58 comment added Michael Hall I edited to remove the unsubstantiated presumption that it was NOT used. Matt, if you know for certain that wasn't used please feel free to roll back my edit, but we'd like to ask that you provide enough information showing it wasn't to justify the original wording.
Jan 13 at 20:56 history edited Michael Hall CC BY-SA 4.0
Edited to remove unsubstantiated presumption that it was not used.
Jan 12 at 16:55 comment added Ralph J I think the suggestion that the Uruguayan military had thermal or IR cameras in 1972 is extremely dubious. Without support for that assertion, the question makes no sense.
Jan 12 at 15:10 comment added Giacomo Catenazzi Also such technologies were often very expensive and only army could have them (and it requires trained personal). I assume it was not the priority of the South American armies/air forces to get such technology (and if they had, probably it was used on navy)
Jan 12 at 12:56 comment added GdD Your premise is incorrect, although there were some examples of thermal imaging cameras in the early 70s the technology wasn't very good, it wasn't until the 80s that it improved enough for this type of use case.
Jan 12 at 6:08 history edited Amazon Dies In Darkness CC BY-SA 4.0
added 14 characters in body
Jan 12 at 6:07 comment added CatchAsCatchCan How do you know such equipment wasn't used?
Jan 12 at 6:07 history edited Amazon Dies In Darkness
edited tags
Jan 12 at 6:06 comment added Amazon Dies In Darkness What was the ambient temperature in the area of S&R efforts? AFAIK, thermal imaging equipment is not very effective for certain types of S&R when the ambient temperature is above a certain threshold. This was likely even more true 51 years ago.
Jan 12 at 2:03 history edited Mike Sowsun CC BY-SA 4.0
More detail added
S Jan 12 at 1:50 review First questions
Jan 12 at 6:03
S Jan 12 at 1:50 history asked Matt Scherman CC BY-SA 4.0