22
$\begingroup$

Why do sometimes (at least in commercial flights) airplanes do a more-than-180-degrees loop after takeoff, in order to aim at the target direction? See image for an example.

I guess that it is part of the flight plan, but it looks like a waste of fuel and time to me.

$\endgroup$
0

2 Answers 2

45
$\begingroup$

Commercial flights are given clearance from ATC to fly specific Standard Instrument Departures (SIDs). In this instance in Venizia, the pilots upon requesting clearance would have been told by ATC to fly the “Vicenza Eight X-ray” (VIC8X) departure, as shown in the purple track below.

Italian AIP Italia AIP - Venezia SIDs1

Your instinct is correct: SIDs are designed to be efficient, not to “waste fuel and time” as you put it.

The primary objective of the design of instrument flight procedures is to ensure safety while taking into account efficiency and operational considerations.

ICAO, Doc 8168, Volume I, Part I, Section 2, Chapter 1

The design of SIDs should aim to ensure the safety of aircraft operations while also facilitating efficient air traffic management.

ICAO Annex 11, Chapter 2, General Provisions

The most important factor however in SID design is safety. Nearby terrain is one of the common big threats to commercial operations. Hence why some SIDs are designed to initially take the flight routing climbing away from the high terrain on departure. A good example of this is Bergamo, Italy - where departures to the North initially turn towards the south on departure before turning back towards the easterly side of the airport (waypoint LEGLO) and continuing enroute northwards.

enter image description here Italia AIP - Bergamo SIDs1

Back to our example in Venezia, there is no immediate terrain so it does seem strange that the VIC8X SID was the cleared routing? As the Venezia charts show, a left turn after departure is an option (green track). The notes at the bottom left of the chart tell us that this departure isn't an option when there is intense military traffic present within the Treviso CTR. So the presence of military traffic would make a left turn departure unsafe due to congested airspace or perhaps limited ATC coverage, hence why the right turn was the only option available.

Terrain, other airports, airspace danger areas or restrictions are other issues of safety which may preclude the flight routing being the most efficient.

For example, London Luton departures to the east: a right turn is made and then 5000ft is maintained - all due to the proximity of London Stansted.

enter image description here

UK AIP - Runway 07 east departing SIDs - initial turn and altitude restrictions are highlighted in yellow

As a pilot myself, I have also had instance where a thunderstorm cell is sitting on the desired departure path, in this instance we may request a completely different routing from those published on the charts. As in many aspects of modern commercial aviation, efficiency is a high priority, but safety always precedes it as required.

Once safety implications are considered, the SID design then might take into account noise abatement. A good example of this is Barcelona, where all departures from runway 24L (southwesterly) make an immediate (quite dramatic) left turn over the sea to climb before turning back towards land. There is a good video on YouTube showing such a departure .

enter image description here

Spanish AIP - Barcelona 24L SIDs - initial turn highlighted in red

However, immediate noise abatement (below ~4000ft) is typically handled by operationally using NADP1 profiles and flying the initial part of the SID slowly and therefore climbing at a steeper gradient (note the "IAS MAX 200" in the Bergamo and Venezia charts).


1 Aeronautical Information Packages (AIPs) are freely available - typically online. In this instance, the Italians have provided the information via an iPad app.

$\endgroup$
1
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ what a great article TY $\endgroup$
    – Fattie
    Commented Jun 7 at 21:49
23
$\begingroup$

A couple of reasons for departures such as this are:

  • terrain. Perhaps the most obvious (but omitted by me and kindly pointed out by Randomhead 😃). The effect of terrain on departure and arrival routes is often emphasized because it limits the possible routes the departing and arriving aircraft can simultaneously take. More on this in the last item on the list
  • noise abatement. Departing aircraft may sometimes fly seemingly irrational patterns due to surrounding residential areas to minimize noise pollution.
  • other airports and restriction & danger areas. There may be other airports/airfields, industrial sites, powerplants or military areas near the airfield that limit the possible routes.
  • crossing arrival and departure routes. It may be that the arrival and departure routes to the airport cross each other, and it will be necessary to maintain vertical separation. Since arriving aircraft need to maintain certain glide profile, the departing aircraft may need to make extra maneuvers to gain enough altitude at certain point, or create lateral separation.
$\endgroup$
9
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ Thanks!! One of the reasons I was particularly puzzled by this case is that turning left would actually disturb less the poor Venetians ( ;-) ) and that landings in Venice always happen arriving from southwards, so there shouldn’t be any disturbance. But indeed, I missed that it could disturb the Treviso traffic. Thanks!! $\endgroup$ Commented Jun 6 at 10:40
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ @JörgWMittag a) doesn't make sense since these departures do the exact opposite, but b) is the reason. I can see SIDs in my charts that turn left after takeoff, but they have a note "SIDs may be authorized only if no heavy military traffic within Treviso CTR". $\endgroup$
    – Bianfable
    Commented Jun 6 at 10:59
  • 5
    $\begingroup$ @RiccardoCeccon remember that this way the aircraft will be higher over the city when crossing residential areas, thus less noise. $\endgroup$
    – jwenting
    Commented Jun 6 at 11:29
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ One other very big (literally!) reason is terrain. Mountains in one direction means you need to turn in the other direction unless you have lots and lots of extra climb performance. $\endgroup$
    – randomhead
    Commented Jun 6 at 13:17
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ @randomhead: terrain is often a factor, but in this specific case, the terrain is pretty much 100% flat in all directions. $\endgroup$
    – rob74
    Commented Jun 7 at 6:10

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .