Timeline for What exactly does the expression "higher straight-in minimums" describe as "higher" relative to which value?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
5 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 26, 2023 at 7:38 | vote | accept | pilot162 | ||
| Feb 22, 2023 at 12:48 | comment | added | pilot162 | Also, I would appreciate it if you could comment on the last image I added because there are 2 RVR values higher than 1500m and 1600m visibility: RVR 1800m and RVR 2200m. In this case, does "or higher straight-in minimums" mean the value higher than the circle-to-land value, or does it mean the highest value from the straight-in landing RVR values? (Will the RVR 1800m or RVR 2200M be used? Will the RVR 1800m or RVR 2200M be used? And under what conditions will it be used? Because there is no condition other than ALS out which is RVR 2200m.) | |
| Feb 22, 2023 at 12:40 | comment | added | pilot162 | What you said is very logical and thank you for the answer, but what I don't understand is that the word "or" is used in the note below. So I can't use the minimum visibility value of 1600m while ALS is out? To be more descriptive, wouldn't it be logical to write "If ALS out, use the straight-in approach minimum values" in the note section? | |
| Feb 22, 2023 at 12:38 | vote | accept | pilot162 | ||
| Feb 22, 2023 at 13:26 | |||||
| Feb 22, 2023 at 7:13 | history | answered | Ralph J♦ | CC BY-SA 4.0 |