Skip to main content
17 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Jan 31, 2023 at 20:12 comment added kj7rrv @DeltaLima not on my phone; the text box disappears as soon as I tap it.
Jan 31, 2023 at 19:56 answer added fab timeline score: 4
Jan 31, 2023 at 19:51 comment added DeltaLima @kj7rrv Whilst the UI is not very nicely adapted for mobile use, you can use chat on a phone.
Jan 31, 2023 at 17:06 comment added kj7rrv @DeltaLima (just commenting to ping you) I posted a question on Meta: aviation.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4416/… Because I'm on my phone, I can't use chat.
S Jan 31, 2023 at 16:58 history mod moved comments to chat
S Jan 31, 2023 at 16:58 comment added DeltaLima Comments have been moved to chat; please do not continue the discussion here. Before posting a comment below this one, please review the purposes of comments. Comments that do not request clarification or suggest improvements usually belong as an answer, on Aviation Meta, or in Aviation Chat. Comments continuing discussion may be removed.
Jan 31, 2023 at 15:12 comment added fab Yes you would have to invert that equation.
Jan 31, 2023 at 14:58 comment added kj7rrv @fab that does the opposite of what I need. I'm trying to find the airspeed of a model plane given the speed and direction of the plane from GPS and the wind speed and direction from an external source.
Jan 31, 2023 at 14:57 comment added kj7rrv @sophit since it takes the direction from which the wind is coming, there is an "implied" 180° rotation which turns it into a subtraction, which is what I need. Ground velocity = air velocity + wind velocity, so air velocity= ground velocity - wind velocity.
Jan 31, 2023 at 12:00 comment added fab Maybe this can help: aviation.stackexchange.com/questions/46741/…
Jan 31, 2023 at 11:58 comment added sophit Do not forget that, since you are summing up flight speed and wind speed, then wind is positive when investing the aircraft from nose to tail.
Jan 31, 2023 at 4:29 history edited kj7rrv CC BY-SA 4.0
deleted 41 characters in body
Jan 31, 2023 at 1:11 history edited kj7rrv CC BY-SA 4.0
added 26 characters in body
Jan 31, 2023 at 1:05 history edited abelenky CC BY-SA 4.0
added 179 characters in body
Jan 31, 2023 at 1:04 history edited abelenky CC BY-SA 4.0
added 179 characters in body
Jan 31, 2023 at 1:04 comment added Jim This kind of question should be broken into two parts. First check the derivation of the equation itself. I.e., the physics and math portion. Once you are sure the math is right, then focus on whether the code faithfully reproduces the calculation. We shouldn't have to derive the equation ourselves just to check your work. :-)
Jan 31, 2023 at 0:57 history asked kj7rrv CC BY-SA 4.0