Skip to main content
Aviation

Return to Answer

edited body
Source Link
user64425
user64425
  • 21
  • 2

Neither has authority over the other, they are supposed to work in cooperation.

Negative interactions get reported and can result in unpleasant consequences for either or both.

Legally, at least in the US, PIC is the final authority for the plane and in the event of a disaster after an argument with and following ATC directions, is unlikely to be able to mount a successful defense on the grounds of “just following riders”orders”

Neither has authority over the other, they are supposed to work in cooperation.

Negative interactions get reported and can result in unpleasant consequences for either or both.

Legally, at least in the US, PIC is the final authority for the plane and in the event of a disaster after an argument with and following ATC directions, is unlikely to be able to mount a successful defense on the grounds of “just following riders”

Neither has authority over the other, they are supposed to work in cooperation.

Negative interactions get reported and can result in unpleasant consequences for either or both.

Legally, at least in the US, PIC is the final authority for the plane and in the event of a disaster after an argument with and following ATC directions, is unlikely to be able to mount a successful defense on the grounds of “just following orders”

Source Link
user64425
user64425
  • 21
  • 2

Neither has authority over the other, they are supposed to work in cooperation.

Negative interactions get reported and can result in unpleasant consequences for either or both.

Legally, at least in the US, PIC is the final authority for the plane and in the event of a disaster after an argument with and following ATC directions, is unlikely to be able to mount a successful defense on the grounds of “just following riders”