Timeline for Why is there this open gap (?) above the root of this DC-10's horizontal stabilizer?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 3, 2022 at 0:04 | vote | accept | Vikki | ||
| Dec 20, 2021 at 15:39 | history | edited | user14897 | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
img
|
| Dec 20, 2021 at 13:36 | history | edited | user14897 | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
m
|
| Dec 20, 2021 at 3:08 | history | edited | user14897 | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
md-11
|
| Dec 20, 2021 at 1:32 | comment | added | Vikki | Could still potentially present problems in the event of a nose-up trim runaway in cruise, though (well, problems in addition to those inherent to a nose-up trim runaway in cruise). As an aside, I'm hoping there's a maintenance task to periodically clear out anything that's blown in through the gap while on the ground... | |
| Dec 20, 2021 at 0:52 | comment | added | user14897 | @Vikki: that angle is way too big to be needed in cruise, see here. | |
| Dec 20, 2021 at 0:49 | comment | added | Vikki | Does the DC-10 AFM have restrictions on the use of extreme stabilizer positions in cruise (which could potentially restrict the aircraft's acceptable CoM envelope more than otherwise would be the case)? | |
| Dec 20, 2021 at 0:42 | history | edited | user14897 | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
m
|
| Dec 20, 2021 at 0:34 | history | answered | user14897 | CC BY-SA 4.0 |