Timeline for What are the Requirements for the implimentation of Low Visibility Procedures at an airport?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 10, 2021 at 2:38 | comment | added | Ralph J♦ | If prevailing visibility is that different from the RVR at a runway, something is probably wildly off (i.e. one of the sensors is reporting inaccurately). Maybe an incredibly thick fog bank at the PV sensor but not at the runway, but that's rare. Almost always, RVR readouts are within +/- 1/4 SM (converting units, of course) of the reported visibility. | |
| Mar 10, 2021 at 1:37 | vote | accept | Avgeeker | ||
| Mar 10, 2021 at 0:04 | answer | added | skipper44 | timeline score: 1 | |
| Mar 9, 2021 at 23:14 | comment | added | skipper44 | You probably need to correct the use of the term "non instrument approach". | |
| Mar 9, 2021 at 11:12 | comment | added | 60levelchange | skybrary.aero/index.php/Low_Visibility_Procedures_(LVP) | |
| Mar 9, 2021 at 10:33 | history | asked | Avgeeker | CC BY-SA 4.0 |