Timeline for How to properly compute the stable vertical path load factor
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 19, 2020 at 14:02 | vote | accept | Jonathan Orr | ||
| Dec 19, 2020 at 6:04 | history | edited | Peter Kämpf | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 180 characters in body
|
| Dec 19, 2020 at 6:02 | comment | added | Peter Kämpf | @JonathanOrr The possible g load does indeed increase with airspeed, but then you have a nonzero pitch rate which needs to be added to the equations above. | |
| Dec 19, 2020 at 3:32 | comment | added | Jonathan Orr | my friend has confused neutral vpath G load with a V-n diagram G load and thinks that the G load increases with airspeed, can you please so the difference between the two. Also, the answer above is pretty good I just didn't quite get why Nx is = -sin(theta)/cos(phi), anyway thanks for the answer. | |
| Dec 18, 2020 at 23:02 | comment | added | Robert DiGiovanni | The answer would imply a flat earth. Thanks to you and Sanchises, we now have a combined formula for lift requirement plane referenced. I am finding it much easier to decompose the weight vector, and leave the (aircraft generated) lift, thrust, and drag vectors whole. | |
| Dec 18, 2020 at 22:39 | history | edited | Peter Kämpf | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 11 characters in body
|
| Dec 18, 2020 at 22:38 | comment | added | Peter Kämpf | @RobertDiGiovanni Z is moving with the aircraft - how can it be earth referenced? | |
| Dec 18, 2020 at 22:34 | comment | added | Robert DiGiovanni | Is there a convention that (large) Nz corresponds to an aircraft referenced z axis? (Since large L is). The diagram seems to show "z" as an earth referenced vector. | |
| Dec 18, 2020 at 19:17 | history | answered | Peter Kämpf | CC BY-SA 4.0 |