Skip to main content
31 events
when toggle format what by license comment
May 15, 2020 at 21:45 vote accept SurfandSky
May 15, 2020 at 18:05 comment added Bianfable @PeterMortensen I approved your edit because it was mostly useful, but you don't have to link everything to Wikipedia. Especially Los Angeles really does not need a Wikipedia link in this question. Also see Do we really need to reference everything to wikipedia? on Meta.
S May 15, 2020 at 18:03 history suggested Peter Mortensen CC BY-SA 4.0
Copy edited (e.g. ref. <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Santa_Catalina_Island_(California)> and <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cessna_172>). Changed to sentence casing for the title. Units for the rest of us.
May 15, 2020 at 17:13 comment added John K @Jason no worries but if you ditch in a high wing airplane like a 172 there is no way you will be able to get out while extracting a life raft. The airplane will sink like a rock and it'll be maximum effort just to get out. If you tether yourself to the raft it'll just end up pulling you under as the airplane sinks. You're going to be in the water 30 min max before a CG helicopter gets there. A Mae West is all you need. Even there, you have to be careful not to inflate it until you're out.
May 15, 2020 at 16:00 review Suggested edits
S May 15, 2020 at 18:03
May 15, 2020 at 15:21 comment added Jason @John K, Respectfully, I disagree. A fire extinguisher is useless in many situations. Seatbelts are useless in head-on collisions over 80MPH. Finding a situation where a safety device is useless is often a subconscious rationalization for a decision we have already made, but don't feel good about. Sure, the life raft probably IS useless in most situations. Would you still decline to take the liferaft if it was free? Why? At the time of this comment, only one person has even mentioned space or weight.
May 14, 2020 at 22:19 comment added John K @Jason the main objection is it's expensive and useless in the situation described.
May 14, 2020 at 19:34 answer added Amazon Dies In Darkness timeline score: 3
May 14, 2020 at 18:46 comment added Jason I'm not a pilot, but an offshore sailor. The only objection you raise is price. I can't put a price on your life. I have read more than a few cases of ships lost at sea which didn't have appropriate safety gear (EPIRB, life raft) because "it was expensive" states the surviving relative. Yet they have expensive "toys" like a $500 Yeti cooler. The yacht (or plane) itself is expensive. It's not a fun expense, but arguably you'll spend less time worrying if you have the proper gear. On the other hand, if you need it and don't have it, you won't regret it for very long...
May 14, 2020 at 18:30 comment added Fred Larson There's a nice video from Aviation 101 on flying to Catalina. No mention of a raft, but they do wear manually inflated life vests. youtube.com/watch?v=CQ3LGEsKb4Y
May 14, 2020 at 18:26 comment added Tim If you are really scared of the water... seaplanesoflosangeles.com
May 14, 2020 at 13:33 comment added DJClayworth @RyanMortensen Thank you. The answers here are very different to the answers on your linked question, so I think it's not really a duplicate.
May 14, 2020 at 13:21 review Close votes
May 14, 2020 at 15:08
May 14, 2020 at 13:00 comment added Ryan Mortensen Does this answer your question? When is flotation gear legally required for pilots and passengers on a non-commercial flight in a small airplane over water?
May 14, 2020 at 12:58 comment added Ryan Mortensen @DJClayworth welcome to the Aviation Stackexchange community. I would have thought the same thing 2 years ago. It is a clear precedent here that marking a question as duplicate is actually less about the question being asked and more about the answers it would generate. So based on the history of moderator judgements and meta questions addressing it, this would be a duplicate because it would generate the same answers. Anything purely opinion-based is really not meant to be asked.
May 14, 2020 at 7:48 comment added Russell McMahon For interest - here is a helicopter marine immersion simulator intended for training oil rig crew prior to flights to platforms off the African coast. This is in a factory in China. When installed you get dropped in a swimming pool and optionally in the dark. I had a (dry) run. Even dry it was surprisingly scary. Helicopter immersion simulator The man in the orange shirt is the client.
May 13, 2020 at 21:00 history tweeted twitter.com/StackAviation/status/1260676258624659459
May 13, 2020 at 20:15 answer added Jpe61 timeline score: 16
May 13, 2020 at 19:58 history became hot network question
May 13, 2020 at 17:59 answer added John K timeline score: 49
May 13, 2020 at 17:12 comment added DJClayworth I don't think it's a duplicate. That's about legality, this is about best practice.
May 13, 2020 at 17:04 history reopened Robert DiGiovanni
bogl
KorvinStarmast
Ryan Mortensen
Jamiec
May 13, 2020 at 16:46 comment added Ryan Mortensen Maybe this should be reopened and closed as a duplicate, not opinion-based. I would expect nearly identical answers. aviation.stackexchange.com/questions/42236/…
May 13, 2020 at 16:06 history edited DJClayworth CC BY-SA 4.0
Tried to make this on topic
S May 13, 2020 at 11:18 history suggested Abdullah is not an Amalekite CC BY-SA 4.0
made the question less opinion-based, added tag "ditching". Also, maybe u could add some numbers, like by how much you're short of land?
May 13, 2020 at 11:01 review Reopen votes
May 13, 2020 at 17:09
May 13, 2020 at 9:45 review Suggested edits
S May 13, 2020 at 11:18
May 13, 2020 at 8:18 history closed 60levelchange
Bianfable
GdD
Jamiec
Opinion-based
May 13, 2020 at 7:42 comment added GdD Have you thought about the size and weight of it, whether you are taking passengers or not? Could you manhandle it out of the airplane after ditching?
May 13, 2020 at 6:36 review Close votes
May 13, 2020 at 8:25
May 13, 2020 at 6:00 history asked SurfandSky CC BY-SA 4.0