There's a lengthy [paper][1] on the NASA web site that investigated this. There's a lot of detail covered in that paper so I'm not going to reproduce any of it here, but the main positive points that emerge are:

• Improved safety margins on landing¹
• Reduced wear on brakes and tyres
• Reduced brake temperature leading to faster aircraft turn around.

Even when setting this against additional engine maintenance and fuel consumption, the airlines surveyed overwhelmingly considered that the installation and use of thrust reversers gave a worthwhile return on investment.

¹ Thrust reversers are not considered when assessing braking systems for certification. [1]: https://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/19950014289.pdf

There's a lengthy paper on the NASA web site that investigated this. There's a lot of detail covered in that paper so I'm not going to reproduce any of it here, but the main positive points that emerge are:

• Improved safety margins on landing¹
• Reduced wear on brakes and tyres
• Reduced brake temperature leading to faster aircraft turn around.

Even when setting this against additional engine maintenance and fuel consumption, the airlines surveyed overwhelmingly considered that the installation and use of thrust reversers gave a worthwhile return on investment.

¹ Thrust reversers are not considered when assessing braking systems for certification.