Timeline for Why does adverse yaw exist?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
11 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 18, 2020 at 21:00 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/StackAviation/status/1229873392154763265 | ||
| Feb 18, 2020 at 19:16 | comment | added | copper.hat | The wing that goes up trades kinetic energy for potential energy and the other wing does the opposite. | |
| Feb 18, 2020 at 6:17 | history | became hot network question | |||
| Feb 18, 2020 at 2:58 | history | edited | Camille Goudeseune | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
copy editing
|
| Feb 18, 2020 at 0:16 | answer | added | Koyovis | timeline score: 7 | |
| Feb 17, 2020 at 23:07 | answer | added | Fiddlesticks | timeline score: 4 | |
| Feb 17, 2020 at 23:05 | comment | added | quiet flyer | One significant component of adverse is yaw is due to roll rate not aileron deflection-- there is sometimes a tendency for the nose to yaw toward the rising wingtip, even if the roll is caused by spoilerons rather than ailerons. However the adverse yaw component due to aileron deflection can also be very significant, and can be seen in some demonstrations that actually involve zero roll rate. As to why-- well... | |
| Feb 17, 2020 at 22:54 | answer | added | DeltaLima♦ | timeline score: 17 | |
| Feb 17, 2020 at 22:51 | history | edited | DeltaLima♦ | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
edited title
|
| Feb 17, 2020 at 22:20 | review | Low quality posts | |||
| Feb 17, 2020 at 23:55 | |||||
| Feb 17, 2020 at 22:04 | history | asked | Mike no smith | CC BY-SA 4.0 |