Skip to main content
14 events
when toggle format what by license comment
S Nov 19, 2019 at 15:48 history suggested T.J.L.
Add missing tags.
Nov 19, 2019 at 14:53 review Suggested edits
S Nov 19, 2019 at 15:48
Nov 16, 2019 at 1:05 answer added Therac timeline score: 10
Nov 15, 2019 at 21:30 comment added user3528438 This is actually a great question. With the current status of AR and VR, I think we are really close to getting this to work. This will save a ton of drag while significantly enhance the pilot's vision, e.g. multi-spectrum imaging and optical-digital zoom. Another application is for tanks where the crew already have very limited visual. If the next generation fighters are still maned, then I believe this would be a key defining feature.
Nov 15, 2019 at 20:03 comment added Bentoy13 The forthcoming X-59 QueSST will be without front-view canopy and with a camera. Not a fighter, but still!
Nov 15, 2019 at 19:21 comment added 60levelchange What would be the benefit of having a screens instead of a canopy? I can think of several obvious drawbacks and risks, but no apparent benefits
Nov 15, 2019 at 18:10 answer added DJClayworth timeline score: 6
Nov 15, 2019 at 9:28 comment added GdD Ejecting a canopy that heavy would be fun!
Nov 15, 2019 at 9:19 comment added Manu H First thought: what if something fails (e.g. due to combat damages)? Second thought: why just remove the canopy? Why not remove the pilot? Then I remembered UAV exists
Nov 15, 2019 at 2:24 answer added John K timeline score: 4
Nov 15, 2019 at 2:15 comment added blacksmith37 So, like a drone except the pilot is at risk ?
Nov 15, 2019 at 1:42 answer added Anilv timeline score: 6
Nov 15, 2019 at 1:15 review First posts
Nov 15, 2019 at 1:15
Nov 15, 2019 at 1:14 history asked Algebraist CC BY-SA 4.0