Timeline for What is the main reason of air-cooled radials producing much less HP/L compared to liquid cooled Vs?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 25, 2019 at 10:39 | answer | added | Penguin | timeline score: 2 | |
| S Jan 24, 2019 at 22:48 | history | suggested | T.J.L. | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Removed edit call-out.
|
| Jan 24, 2019 at 20:59 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Jan 24, 2019 at 22:48 | |||||
| Jan 24, 2019 at 19:56 | answer | added | godzillachomps | timeline score: 1 | |
| Jan 24, 2019 at 18:18 | comment | added | Mike Sowsun | Radials do not produce "much less" HP/L. By the end of WW II, radials and inline engines were all very similar in horsepower to displacement numbers. Most had max horsepower numbers approaching up to 1 horsepower to 1 cubic inch. | |
| Jan 24, 2019 at 16:44 | history | edited | Meatball Princess | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 43 characters in body; edited title
|
| Jan 24, 2019 at 16:19 | comment | added | John K | The Merlin is .8 and the R2800 .89 lb/hp. But does the Merlin's number include the coolant and radiator? | |
| Jan 24, 2019 at 15:46 | history | asked | Meatball Princess | CC BY-SA 4.0 |