Timeline for Do high-speed ailerons help with the roll rate control in non-FBW?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 2, 2018 at 21:56 | vote | accept | CommunityBot | moved from User.Id=14897 by developer User.Id=59471 | |
| Aug 21, 2017 at 16:07 | comment | added | user14897 | That's okay, I just wanted to be sure we were on the same page. It's an informative answer still. Thank you. | |
| Aug 21, 2017 at 15:56 | comment | added | Koyovis | From what I've seen yes, but unfortunately my references are anecdotal and from observation as a passenger. | |
| Aug 21, 2017 at 15:46 | comment | added | user14897 | That's my point, Airbus use FBW, Boeing initially did not. So do the inbd ailerons of Boeings as a secondary benefit help in the control? | |
| Aug 21, 2017 at 15:38 | comment | added | Koyovis | Yes it has a single aileron per wing, they could fix the oscillation without the help of an inboard aileron, Airbus apparently can as well. | |
| Aug 21, 2017 at 15:24 | comment | added | user14897 | The Fokker 100 (?) had a single aileron per wing, right? Which means a secondary inboard one would have helped? | |
| Aug 21, 2017 at 15:16 | history | edited | Koyovis | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 221 characters in body
|
| Aug 21, 2017 at 15:06 | history | answered | Koyovis | CC BY-SA 3.0 |