Skip to main content
8 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Dec 12, 2018 at 18:58 comment added summerrain "You assume that an increasing velocity towards the satellite means decreasing distance towards the satellite. That is false." Why? If I run towards you with increasing velocity, my distance from you will decrease, obviously.
Jun 20, 2014 at 16:55 comment added user2168 @user2357 The problem is your interpretation. You assume that an increasing velocity towards the satellite means decreasing distance towards the satellite. That is false.
Jun 19, 2014 at 4:43 comment added user2357 If the BOF chart shows constantly increasing velocity towards the satellite, then the track distance should also reflect that. The problem is not my interpretation. The aircraft could not have flown the track suggested and give the offset frequency values reported. One or other is a lie and the lie is the official accident report's track which is a mere speculation.
May 17, 2014 at 8:30 comment added Mark The "frequency offset" is a Doppler-effect-derived value. It's related to the speed of the aircraft towards/away from the satellite, not its distance; the rising line is consistent with an aircraft slowly turning away from the satellite. (It's also consistent with the aircraft performing a number of more improbable maneuvers, which is why the chart is simply the most likely track.)
May 16, 2014 at 14:41 history closed Federico
Dan Pichelman
RedGrittyBrick
TypeIA
flyingfisch
Duplicate of How can a computer model yield two possible flight paths of MH370 in South Indian Ocean?, How could MH370 fly west when satellite pings went east? [duplicate]
May 16, 2014 at 13:18 review Close votes
May 16, 2014 at 14:41
May 16, 2014 at 12:45 answer added Federico timeline score: 1
May 16, 2014 at 6:19 history asked user2357 CC BY-SA 3.0