Timeline for Can a military pilot make his airplane invisible for the ATCs?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
5 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 3, 2017 at 16:20 | comment | added | mongo | Methods varying the spectral and temporal signals are good methods, as they tend to block simplistic counter-measures. | |
| Apr 3, 2017 at 16:18 | comment | added | mongo | There are active techniques which are not clearly observable by ATC primary radar and effectively prevent the display (and detection) by primary radar. | |
| Apr 3, 2017 at 7:53 | comment | added | alex | I worked on the TPS-75 in the air force, it used frequency staggering. So it would send a pulse at 2.9 GHz then one at 3.1 and some more in between. It did this in a certain order that might be classified, I'm not sure. I think the reason for this was to make jamming a bit more difficult. It also had some feature that would show which azimuth jamming was coming from if jamming indeed was being attempted. | |
| Apr 2, 2017 at 20:35 | comment | added | TomMcW | If the target uses active jamming the ATC will know it. And most likely would not be able to see anyting on primary radar. | |
| Apr 2, 2017 at 14:10 | history | answered | mongo | CC BY-SA 3.0 |