Timeline for What is the story of this aircraft?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
19 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 17, 2020 at 8:28 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
Commonmark migration
|
|
| Feb 4, 2019 at 9:38 | history | edited | mins | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
deleted 10 characters in body
|
| Mar 4, 2017 at 18:47 | vote | accept | mins | ||
| Mar 2, 2017 at 20:26 | comment | added | Rich | @DavidRicherby Agreed. There's a huge difference between "a lecture" and "someone belching in the audience". | |
| Mar 2, 2017 at 19:11 | comment | added | user189035 | It's also similar to the ANT-20 and other aircrafts from that era | |
| Mar 2, 2017 at 13:44 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/StackAviation/status/837297593436745732 | ||
| Mar 2, 2017 at 10:01 | history | edited | mins | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 111 characters in body
|
| Mar 2, 2017 at 8:25 | comment | added | David Richerby | @RonBeyer No, there's a huge difference. The articles on Snopes are reasonably well researched and are OK as sources; the discussion forums are just random people posting random stuff. You wouldn't, I hope, say "According to an article on some respected news organization's website" if what you actually meant was "According to the comments posted under that article." Same thing here. | |
| Mar 2, 2017 at 6:42 | history | edited | mins | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 27 characters in body
|
| Mar 2, 2017 at 6:31 | history | edited | mins | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
edited body
|
| Mar 2, 2017 at 6:25 | history | edited | mins | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
edited body
|
| Mar 2, 2017 at 6:14 | history | edited | mins | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Added actual aircraft image and explanation.
|
| Mar 2, 2017 at 2:49 | comment | added | Ron Beyer | @DavidRicherby Article, post, rant, not a lot of difference on the 'net these days... | |
| Mar 2, 2017 at 0:13 | answer | added | Dave | timeline score: 33 | |
| Mar 1, 2017 at 23:43 | comment | added | David Richerby | @RonBeyer That's not "an article on Snopes" -- it's a post on Snopes's discussion forums. (But I agree that it's more obvious there that the images are CGI.) | |
| Mar 1, 2017 at 23:37 | comment | added | Ron Beyer | If you look close, you can see the people are computer generated... Here is an article on Snopes.com, not that Snopes is a great reference, but the computer-generated-ness is a lot more apparent. | |
| Mar 1, 2017 at 23:11 | answer | added | Ralph J♦ | timeline score: 11 | |
| Mar 1, 2017 at 23:06 | history | edited | mins | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 54 characters in body
|
| Mar 1, 2017 at 22:57 | history | asked | mins | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
