Skip to main content
7 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Jul 10, 2016 at 20:10 comment added Zach Lipton Well the pilots in Asiana 214 were Korean, not Chinese as he originally stated, but in any case. I agree that culture makes a difference, and there's been a lot of human factors research on precisely that issue, but I really don't see how it answers the question to say that two [American] pilots did incredibly well in two cherry-picked extremely difficult situations and a crew of [some other country] pilots screwed the pooch in one cherry-picked routine situation. I'm also not quite sure what the question is to be honest: is it flying by the seat of your pants if you still look at instruments?
Jul 10, 2016 at 19:55 comment added Terry @ZachLipton It is not the race of the pilots that is relevant, but the culture from which the pilots come. In Japanese and Korean cockpits there was a culture in the past that captains would not be challenged. Back in the days of three-man cockpits both KAL and JAL, as I remember, employed American crew members to counter this, knowing that, for example, an American f.e. would have no problem challenging a captain if need be.
Jul 10, 2016 at 14:25 comment added vasin1987 Quite sure he refers to Asiana 214. If the crew consult instrument and follow procedure properly accident maybe avoided. Thus seat of pants is not a reliable means. Agree that this answer could be expanded. As of now it is too short.
Jul 10, 2016 at 12:33 history edited Ralph J CC BY-SA 3.0
deleted 3 characters in body
Jul 10, 2016 at 10:53 review Low quality posts
Jul 10, 2016 at 12:33
Jul 9, 2016 at 23:59 comment added Zach Lipton I'm not sure which accident at SFO you're referring to, but more to the point, what does the race of the pilots have to do with anything?
Jul 9, 2016 at 23:14 history answered Skip Miller CC BY-SA 3.0