Skip to main content
24 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Apr 13, 2017 at 12:59 history edited CommunityBot
replaced http://aviation.stackexchange.com/ with https://aviation.stackexchange.com/
Jun 20, 2016 at 6:36 vote accept Ryan Mortensen
Jun 20, 2016 at 6:36 history edited Ryan Mortensen CC BY-SA 3.0
Further clarified question is specific to GPS speed tracking in any aircraft.
Jun 19, 2016 at 3:01 review Close votes
Jun 20, 2016 at 18:46
Jun 14, 2016 at 6:10 comment added Ryan Mortensen Following the close vote's logic here, "How does an inertial navigation system measure a plane's ground speed?" would also be a duplicate, even though IMHO it isn't at all. This is really about indexing properly as to not create a wild goose chase for answers.
Jun 13, 2016 at 17:20 history edited Ryan Mortensen CC BY-SA 3.0
Detailed that the question is not about generic ground speed measurement encompassing all methods but specifically for GPS technology.
Jun 13, 2016 at 17:16 comment added Ryan Mortensen A good practice is to leave the following format of comment: "Related: How is the actual ground speed of an airliner measured?
Jun 13, 2016 at 17:14 comment added Ryan Mortensen What we're saying here is that an answer to How is the actual ground speed of an airliner measured?, in short, could be "by using GPS technology." However, "How does GPS technology measure ground speed" is not answered by, "By using GPS technology." Although some of the information may indeed overlap, this simplifies the search for knowledge by having a more targeted question with a more targeted answer.
Jun 13, 2016 at 15:43 comment added fooot @Pondlife per meta If you ask a question similar to another question and it is likely to get the exact same answer, you have yourself a duplicate question. imo, ground speed in general is not that much more complex and sufficiently covers the GPS part, there is no reason to answer it again.
Jun 13, 2016 at 15:38 comment added Pondlife @fooot It doesn't matter whether casey's answer applies here or not, we can't start marking things as dupes because of overlapping answers. See the comments on this question for a clearer example of why - in my opinion - it's a bad idea. Personally, I'd rather see 5 short, simple, obvious questions with equally simple answers than one 'generic' question that might answer everything if you read through all the answers.
Jun 13, 2016 at 15:26 review Close votes
Jun 13, 2016 at 17:14
Jun 13, 2016 at 15:20 comment added Ryan Mortensen So, is SE beginning to institute the marking of duplicate answers then? This is not the same question.
Jun 13, 2016 at 15:10 comment added fooot From casey's answer to that question, Comparing two GPS derived locations will yield a velocity vector and ground speed is its magnitude.
Jun 13, 2016 at 15:06 comment added Ryan Mortensen @fooot I don't think it is, and since there is no question with a very similar title, considering the simplicity of the question, I decided to go ahead and get it knocked out on here. Nothing says a question isn't allowed to be simple, or obvious.
Jun 13, 2016 at 14:41 history reopened mins
Pondlife
fooot
SMS von der Tann
hmakholm left over Monica
Jun 13, 2016 at 14:39 comment added fooot Could be a duplicate of this more general question on ground speed though.
Jun 13, 2016 at 14:25 history edited Pondlife CC BY-SA 3.0
Reworded
Jun 13, 2016 at 14:10 review Reopen votes
Jun 13, 2016 at 14:45
Jun 13, 2016 at 13:54 comment added mins It's quite strange that the determination of the aircraft ground speed using a GPS is off-topic. It's a trivial question that may be closed, but not with the off topic criteria imho. VTR.
Jun 13, 2016 at 11:44 history closed 60levelchange
Federico
jklingler
kevin
user14897
Not suitable for this site
Jun 13, 2016 at 6:42 answer added mins timeline score: 2
Jun 13, 2016 at 6:41 answer added sweber timeline score: 3
Jun 13, 2016 at 6:31 review Close votes
Jun 13, 2016 at 11:44
Jun 13, 2016 at 6:03 history asked Ryan Mortensen CC BY-SA 3.0