Skip to main content
12 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Apr 29, 2016 at 18:42 comment added Simon @TomMcW Cool, you should post questions. I agree they would be good to have on the site. In essence, tandem rotors remove the need to use some engine power (which can be significant) to drive a tail rotor, since the torque reaction of the rotors cancel each other, meaning more power for creating lift. They also have a much wider longitudanal range for the CofG envelope making them great for shifting cargo.
Apr 29, 2016 at 18:37 comment added TomMcW @Simon Just in general. If I get a chance I might post a question or two. I don't think we have many tandem rotor questions on here. Surprising since the CH-46/47 are such successful aircraft.
Apr 29, 2016 at 18:29 comment added Simon @TomMcW Anything specific or just in general?
Apr 29, 2016 at 13:51 comment added TomMcW @Simon I'm going to have to read up on tandem rotors. After reading in SE I've finally got a general idea of how helicopters fly, I just can't picture the flight dynamics of a Chinook in my head like a standard helo.
Apr 29, 2016 at 13:25 comment added Simon @TomMcW Hi Tom. Simply put, yes. There are no fundamental differences. It will just need less pedal work since there is no torque reaction to pedal changes.
Apr 29, 2016 at 1:41 comment added TomMcW What if you had to save the day in a Chinook? Does a tandem rotor craft work with the same basic set of principals?
Apr 27, 2016 at 15:40 comment added FreeMan Now I want Simon to take me for a ride!
Apr 27, 2016 at 11:37 vote accept UnrecognizedFallingObject
Apr 27, 2016 at 7:11 comment added mins So many relevant details in an easy reading narrative form. Good idea!
Apr 27, 2016 at 6:33 history edited Simon CC BY-SA 3.0
added 47 characters in body
Apr 27, 2016 at 5:45 history edited Simon CC BY-SA 3.0
added 565 characters in body
Apr 27, 2016 at 5:39 history answered Simon CC BY-SA 3.0