Skip to main content
26 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Apr 13, 2017 at 12:59 history edited CommunityBot
replaced http://aviation.stackexchange.com/ with https://aviation.stackexchange.com/
Apr 14, 2016 at 18:26 history edited user13197 CC BY-SA 3.0
added 219 characters in body
Feb 16, 2016 at 15:18 vote accept user13197
S Feb 16, 2016 at 15:08 history bounty ended user13197
S Feb 16, 2016 at 15:08 history notice removed user13197
Feb 16, 2016 at 1:28 vote accept user13197
Feb 16, 2016 at 15:18
Feb 16, 2016 at 1:25 answer added aeroalias timeline score: 6
Feb 15, 2016 at 20:08 comment added Todd Wilcox Another possibility is that leading edges have to be periodically replaced, and it's cheaper to keep the polished aluminum look rather than have custom colors applied for what is essentially a consumable part. Frankly, I suspect erosion is a likely factor in the answer to your question about engine fairings.
Feb 15, 2016 at 20:05 comment added Todd Wilcox Looks like I might be on to something but not quite right. "Leading edge erosion" is a problem. One solution appears to be applying erosion resistant films to leading edges. I wouldn't be surprised if the films have to be replaced from time to time, and that application and removal of the films might be best done on bare metal rather than painted metal. 3M's page on leading edge films
Feb 15, 2016 at 20:00 comment added Todd Wilcox I always assumed a lot of leading edges were left unpainted on all kinds of aircraft because of the paint frequently wearing off in those places. Better to leave it neatly unpainted than to have unsightly chips that have to be frequently touched up.
Feb 15, 2016 at 17:09 history tweeted twitter.com/StackAviation/status/699279474299379712
Feb 15, 2016 at 15:54 history edited user13197 CC BY-SA 3.0
added 2 characters in body
Feb 15, 2016 at 14:39 history edited user13197 CC BY-SA 3.0
added 115 characters in body
Feb 15, 2016 at 14:28 history edited user13197 CC BY-SA 3.0
added 143 characters in body
S Feb 15, 2016 at 13:58 history bounty started user13197
S Feb 15, 2016 at 13:58 history notice added user13197 Draw attention
Feb 13, 2016 at 19:09 comment added Porcupine911 The 787 does not have heated empennage leading edges. The anti-ice is only on some of the wing slats. This 787-9 has the Hybrid Laminar Flow Control system integrated into the tailplane leading edges.
Feb 13, 2016 at 17:34 history edited user13197
edited tags
Feb 13, 2016 at 17:10 comment added user13197 On this video: youtube.com/watch?v=Q_NjnaUKcIk (minute 16:23-16:55) a man is putting a tube on the leading edge of the wing and then covers it with a bare metal. Perhaps the same happens on the leading edge of horizontal and vetical stabilizers.
Feb 12, 2016 at 15:50 review Close votes
Feb 12, 2016 at 16:38
Feb 12, 2016 at 14:29 history edited FreeMan CC BY-SA 3.0
improve title, spell check
Feb 11, 2016 at 23:00 comment added J W @JanHudec As I'm sure you know, many aircraft have no anti-icing systems at all, or have only pitot probe heat. I don't think you meant to include these types in your statement, but I just wanted to make sure that is clear to others.
Feb 11, 2016 at 22:29 comment added Lnafziger @JanHudec Not all aircraft have heated horizontal or vertical stabilizers (for instance, the Learjets only have the horizontal stabilizer heated (electrically), and the Falcons don't heat either one at all).
Feb 11, 2016 at 22:26 comment added fooot @JanHudec perhaps there is an option to paint them, with a reduction in icing allowances.
Feb 11, 2016 at 21:47 comment added Ron Beyer Yes, it uses a heated edge system designed to melt the boundary layer of ice on leading edge surfaces. The system is designed by GKN.
Feb 11, 2016 at 21:22 history asked user13197 CC BY-SA 3.0