Timeline for Why is an accident referred to by flight number instead of registration number of the airframe?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 23, 2015 at 15:02 | vote | accept | SQB | ||
| Sep 6, 2015 at 13:49 | comment | added | mins | @corsiKa: That's not how courts see the thing, responsibility can also be imputed to the manufacturer, the airline, or the ATC, or indeed to the hijacker if there is one. But my comment was more about media sullying pilot's good name before the safety agencies even know the causes. MH370 is a study case. The captain was using a flight simulator at home to land on difficult runways... ooh... very very very suspicious... | |
| Sep 4, 2015 at 21:55 | comment | added | corsiKa | Unfortunate or not, at the end of the day, the Captain is responsible for his ship. | |
| Sep 4, 2015 at 16:28 | history | edited | RedGrittyBrick | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 238 characters in body
|
| Sep 4, 2015 at 14:13 | comment | added | mins | I think the flight number is more a media thing, like the name of the unfortunate pilot printed everywhere. | |
| Sep 4, 2015 at 14:09 | history | edited | RedGrittyBrick | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 172 characters in body
|
| Sep 4, 2015 at 13:56 | history | edited | RedGrittyBrick | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 182 characters in body
|
| Sep 4, 2015 at 13:47 | history | edited | RedGrittyBrick | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 190 characters in body
|
| Sep 4, 2015 at 13:37 | history | answered | RedGrittyBrick | CC BY-SA 3.0 |