Skip to main content
Tweeted twitter.com/StackAviation/status/963661110518931456
deleted 3 characters in body
Source Link
Federico
  • 32.7k
  • 17
  • 140
  • 184

I watched some videos on YouTube where the pilot used the thrust-reverser for push-back instead of the push-back tug. Some examples:

MD80 Powerback

DC9 Ground Reverser Powerback

Is this procedure currently in use? Would an airline today certify a 737, or even turboprop, like a Beechcraft 1900D, be to execute such a maneuver?

I've also seen a Boeing 727 video. 727s and MD80s have the engines attached directly to the fuselage, not in the wings. Would that be one of the reasons?

I watched some videos on YouTube where the pilot used the thrust-reverser for push-back instead of the push-back tug. Some examples:

MD80 Powerback

DC9 Ground Reverser Powerback

Is this procedure currently in use? Would an airline today certify a 737, or even turboprop, like a Beechcraft 1900D, be to execute such a maneuver?

I've also seen a Boeing 727 video. 727s and MD80s have the engines attached directly to the fuselage, not in the wings. Would that be one of the reasons?

I watched some videos on YouTube where the pilot used the thrust-reverser for push-back instead of the push-back tug. Some examples:

MD80 Powerback

DC9 Ground Reverser Powerback

Is this procedure currently in use? Would an airline today certify a 737, or even turboprop, like a Beechcraft 1900D, to execute such a maneuver?

I've also seen a Boeing 727 video. 727s and MD80s have the engines attached directly to the fuselage, not in the wings. Would that be one of the reasons?

Post Reopened by fooot, Farhan, kevin, Peter Kämpf, Federico
clarify the OP's intention (is it currently in use?)
Source Link
kevin
  • 39.8k
  • 17
  • 152
  • 280

I watched some videos on YouTube where the pilot used the thrust-reverser for push-back instead of the push-back tug. Some examples:

MD80 Powerback

DC9 Ground Reverser Powerback

Is this procedure currently in use? Would an airline today certify a 737, or even turboprop, like a Beechcraft 1900D, be to execute such a maneuver?

I've also seen a Boeing 727 video. 727s and MD80s have the engines attached directly to the fuselage, not in the wings. Would that would be one of the reasons?

Would a 737, or even turboprop, like a Beechcraft 1900D, be currently allowed by the airline to execute such a maneuver?

I watched some videos on YouTube where the pilot used the thrust-reverser for push-back instead of the push-back tug. Some examples:

MD80 Powerback

DC9 Ground Reverser Powerback

I've also seen a Boeing 727 video. 727s and MD80s have the engines attached directly to the fuselage, not in the wings. Would that would be one of the reasons?

Would a 737, or even turboprop, like a Beechcraft 1900D, be currently allowed by the airline to execute such a maneuver?

I watched some videos on YouTube where the pilot used the thrust-reverser for push-back instead of the push-back tug. Some examples:

MD80 Powerback

DC9 Ground Reverser Powerback

Is this procedure currently in use? Would an airline today certify a 737, or even turboprop, like a Beechcraft 1900D, be to execute such a maneuver?

I've also seen a Boeing 727 video. 727s and MD80s have the engines attached directly to the fuselage, not in the wings. Would that be one of the reasons?

added 65 characters in body; edited title
Source Link
Farhan
  • 29.5k
  • 15
  • 114
  • 185

Powerback still in use Is a powerback allowed by airlines as a safe maneuver?

I watched some videos on YouTube where the pilot used the thrust-reverser for push-back instead of the push-back tug. Some examples:

MD80 Powerback

DC9 Ground Reverser Powerback

I've also seen a Boeing 727 video. 727s and MD80s have the engines attached directly to the fuselage, not in the wings. Would that would be one of the reasons?

Would a 737, or even turboprop, like a Beechcraft 1900DBeechcraft 1900D, be currently allowed by the airline to execute such a maneuver?

Powerback still in use?

I watched some videos on YouTube where the pilot used the thrust-reverser for push-back instead of the push-back tug. Some examples:

MD80 Powerback

DC9 Ground Reverser Powerback

I've also seen a Boeing 727 video. 727s and MD80s have the engines attached directly to the fuselage, not in the wings. Would that would be one of the reasons?

Would a 737, or even turboprop, like a Beechcraft 1900D, be currently allowed by the airline to execute such a maneuver?

Is a powerback allowed by airlines as a safe maneuver?

I watched some videos on YouTube where the pilot used the thrust-reverser for push-back instead of the push-back tug. Some examples:

MD80 Powerback

DC9 Ground Reverser Powerback

I've also seen a Boeing 727 video. 727s and MD80s have the engines attached directly to the fuselage, not in the wings. Would that would be one of the reasons?

Would a 737, or even turboprop, like a Beechcraft 1900D, be currently allowed by the airline to execute such a maneuver?

Inside voice please
Source Link
fooot
  • 73.8k
  • 25
  • 240
  • 434
Loading
added 51 characters in body
Source Link
Ygor Montenegro
  • 1.7k
  • 5
  • 20
  • 29
Loading
Post Closed as "Duplicate" by fooot, Pondlife, mins, SentryRaven, Farhan
Fix grammar
Source Link
FreeMan
  • 16.4k
  • 17
  • 88
  • 167
Loading
Source Link
Ygor Montenegro
  • 1.7k
  • 5
  • 20
  • 29
Loading