Timeline for Can a large passenger aircraft recover from a stall?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
22 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 22, 2015 at 8:41 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/#!/StackAviation/status/558182557368733696 | ||
| Jan 21, 2015 at 3:02 | review | Close votes | |||
| Jan 21, 2015 at 8:05 | |||||
| Jan 17, 2015 at 10:47 | answer | added | RedGrittyBrick | timeline score: 6 | |
| S Jan 17, 2015 at 8:15 | answer | added | flyboy128 | timeline score: 1 | |
| S Jan 17, 2015 at 8:15 | history | protected | CommunityBot | ||
| Jan 17, 2015 at 5:16 | answer | added | user6885 | timeline score: 3 | |
| Jan 17, 2015 at 4:02 | answer | added | Vibhas Vatve | timeline score: 0 | |
| Jan 16, 2015 at 21:46 | comment | added | reirab | @CGCampbell Also, I'm not sure that a false premise in a question actually makes it off-topic. It's not unusual for someone not familiar with a field to have false assumptions about it (or even for someone familiar with a field to have false assumptions about some more obscure parts of it.) The underlying question - whether an airliner can be recovered from a stall - is perfectly answerable and on-topic - and has been answered. | |
| Jan 16, 2015 at 21:00 | comment | added | reirab | @CGCampbell Well, not directly, but they are somewhat correlated... negatively. :) I don't think the question of whether an airliner can be recovered from a stall is off-topic, though. Also, stall recovery does usually involve a maneuver (though it's a pretty trivial one,) so the question isn't entirely incorrect, though it does use 'maneuverability' contrary to its normal meaning within aviation. | |
| Jan 16, 2015 at 20:40 | answer | added | Anixx | timeline score: 2 | |
| Jan 16, 2015 at 19:52 | answer | added | Tyler Durden | timeline score: 0 | |
| Jan 16, 2015 at 19:21 | review | Close votes | |||
| Jan 16, 2015 at 21:22 | |||||
| Jan 16, 2015 at 19:06 | comment | added | CGCampbell | I think this may be off-topic because the basis of your question is flawed: maneuverability and stall recoverability are not normally linked. | |
| Jan 16, 2015 at 17:12 | history | edited | voretaq7 |
edited tags
|
|
| Jan 16, 2015 at 16:13 | answer | added | reirab | timeline score: 44 | |
| Jan 16, 2015 at 15:27 | history | edited | Pondlife | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Changed title to reflect that the question is about stalls
|
| Jan 16, 2015 at 15:26 | comment | added | Jan Hudec | Manoeuvrability normally means how sharp turn an aircraft can make and how quickly it can roll into and out of it. Stall and spin recoveries are rather independent of that. | |
| Jan 16, 2015 at 15:26 | comment | added | Pondlife | This question may be related, although it's about spins, not stalls | |
| Jan 16, 2015 at 15:25 | answer | added | DJClayworth | timeline score: 22 | |
| Jan 16, 2015 at 15:15 | history | edited | Farhan | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 27 characters in body
|
| Jan 16, 2015 at 15:10 | answer | added | Skip Miller | timeline score: 7 | |
| Jan 16, 2015 at 14:53 | history | asked | Thangaraj Sundaramoorthy | CC BY-SA 3.0 |