Timeline for Why do some back course operations use normal sensing?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 13, 2021 at 1:00 | comment | added | mins | "So yes, this particular localizer is designed to transmit backwards": This may be incorrect. Here is the array, and the front lobes seem to be used to transmit the signal. Source. | |
| Nov 26, 2021 at 23:09 | comment | added | user22445 | I-PKN localizer is not designed to "transmit backwards." It's actually the normal backcourse of the I-PKN localizer. When you fly a localizer backcourse in the opposite direction (like some missed approach procedures require) you are getting the same normal sensing you get on any localizer approach when flying opposite direction on the backcourse. | |
| Mar 19, 2014 at 21:13 | vote | accept | Aaron | ||
| Jan 17, 2014 at 12:25 | comment | added | Lnafziger | @xpda I've only flown it once in IMC, but all the time as part of the departure. Many people won't even attempt the approach unless they can expect to see the airport at KICER. | |
| Jan 17, 2014 at 6:55 | comment | added | xpda | Aspen is odd because the I-PKN localizer is used only for the missed approach. That missed approach is "interesting" to fly. | |
| Jan 16, 2014 at 21:50 | history | edited | Lnafziger | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
grammar
|
| Jan 16, 2014 at 19:30 | history | edited | Lnafziger | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 47 characters in body
|
| Jan 16, 2014 at 19:23 | history | answered | Lnafziger | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
