Timeline for Top loading an aircraft vs bottom loading
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
6 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Nov 23 at 23:54 | comment | added | WPNSGuy | As the person who would be loading/reloading/unloading those munitions, I can say without reservation that overwing hardpoints would increase the complexity, manpower, and time required. A LOT. | |
Nov 23 at 22:14 | history | edited | Romeo_4808N | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 18 characters in body
|
Nov 23 at 22:02 | comment | added | Romeo_4808N | Yes, I have a tendency to dictate my answers and Apple speech recognition is not very good at picking up on what a sentence structure should be. | |
Nov 23 at 22:02 | history | edited | Romeo_4808N | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 18 characters in body
|
Nov 23 at 20:19 | comment | added | Peter Cordes | You have random commas in several places that make this hard to read, e.g. "combat, aircraft". And "airplane's, radar cross-section". | |
Nov 23 at 17:54 | history | answered | Romeo_4808N | CC BY-SA 4.0 |