Skip to main content
added 93 characters in body
Source Link
mins
  • 81.2k
  • 30
  • 327
  • 476

Does the FAA require the airlines to maintain continual communication with aircraft that can't be switched off?

No, there is no such requirement for radios, they can be switched off, they can fail, and propagation conditions may not allow to establish a radio link using terrestrial networks.

Every 10 seconds, the aircraft should report very basic parameters like position, altitude, speed, heading, engine power, and fuel. You can put all that into a single IP packet. Surely this must have occurred to someone? Are the airlines resisting

  • At the time of MH370 it was already possible using satcom and ACARS. ACARS can report a status using VHF or satcom. Satcom is used when overflying areas without VHF ground stations (desert, ocean).

  • MH370 had a satcom equipement to use ACARS, but didn't pay for the subscription, so they were not able to transmit ACARS when remote of VHF stations.

  • Why the subscription wasn't paid is likely because this would increase the ticket price, something passengers don't want, so airlines are indeed reluctant.

  • Nevertheless, considering the huge cost of Search and Rescue operations for MH370 and AF447, States are asking for the generalization of a space ATC. In space ATC communications with ATC can be done by multiple means, including satellites.

  • Space ATC is currently under preparation, but some elements are already deployed, e.g. the position can be reported from nearly everywhere using space-based ADS-B:

    Aircraft equipped with ADS-B can stream their exact position and altitude twice per second, wherever they are in the world, to a network of 66 satellites.

    Source: Space-based ADS-B helps NAV CANADA reach new safety milestone.

    If we are able to follow aircraft overflying oceans and desert areas on flight tracking sites, this is because they continuously report their position using a satellite and space ADS-B.

This question is recurrent under multiple forms, focusing on different aspects, so this overview is already refined in:

The answers may be outdated though, as this is a field which is under active development.

Does the FAA require the airlines to maintain continual communication with aircraft that can't be switched off?

No, there is no such requirement for radios, they can be switched off, they can fail, and propagation conditions may not allow to establish a radio link using terrestrial networks.

Every 10 seconds, the aircraft should report very basic parameters like position, altitude, speed, heading, engine power, and fuel. You can put all that into a single IP packet. Surely this must have occurred to someone? Are the airlines resisting

  • At the time of MH370 it was already possible using satcom and ACARS. ACARS can report a status using VHF or satcom. Satcom is used when overflying areas without VHF ground stations (desert, ocean).

  • MH370 had a satcom equipement to use ACARS, but didn't pay for the subscription, so they were not able to transmit ACARS when remote of VHF stations.

  • Why the subscription wasn't paid is likely because this would increase the ticket price, something passengers don't want, so airlines are indeed reluctant.

  • Nevertheless, considering the huge cost of Search and Rescue operations for MH370 and AF447, States are asking for the generalization of a space ATC. In space ATC communications with ATC can be done by multiple means, including satellites.

  • Space ATC is currently under preparation, but some elements are already deployed, e.g. the position can be reported from nearly everywhere using space-based ADS-B:

    Aircraft equipped with ADS-B can stream their exact position and altitude twice per second, wherever they are in the world, to a network of 66 satellites.

    Source: Space-based ADS-B helps NAV CANADA reach new safety milestone.

    If we are able to follow aircraft overflying oceans and desert areas on flight tracking sites, this is because they continuously report their position using a satellite and space ADS-B.

This question is recurrent under multiple forms, focusing on different aspects, so this overview is already refined in:

Does the FAA require the airlines to maintain continual communication with aircraft that can't be switched off?

No, there is no such requirement for radios, they can be switched off, they can fail, and propagation conditions may not allow to establish a radio link using terrestrial networks.

Every 10 seconds, the aircraft should report very basic parameters like position, altitude, speed, heading, engine power, and fuel. You can put all that into a single IP packet. Surely this must have occurred to someone? Are the airlines resisting

  • At the time of MH370 it was already possible using satcom and ACARS. ACARS can report a status using VHF or satcom. Satcom is used when overflying areas without VHF ground stations (desert, ocean).

  • MH370 had a satcom equipement to use ACARS, but didn't pay for the subscription, so they were not able to transmit ACARS when remote of VHF stations.

  • Why the subscription wasn't paid is likely because this would increase the ticket price, something passengers don't want, so airlines are indeed reluctant.

  • Nevertheless, considering the huge cost of Search and Rescue operations for MH370 and AF447, States are asking for the generalization of a space ATC. In space ATC communications with ATC can be done by multiple means, including satellites.

  • Space ATC is currently under preparation, but some elements are already deployed, e.g. the position can be reported from nearly everywhere using space-based ADS-B:

    Aircraft equipped with ADS-B can stream their exact position and altitude twice per second, wherever they are in the world, to a network of 66 satellites.

    Source: Space-based ADS-B helps NAV CANADA reach new safety milestone.

    If we are able to follow aircraft overflying oceans and desert areas on flight tracking sites, this is because they continuously report their position using a satellite and space ADS-B.

This question is recurrent under multiple forms, focusing on different aspects, so this overview is already refined in:

The answers may be outdated though, as this is a field which is under active development.

added 238 characters in body
Source Link
mins
  • 81.2k
  • 30
  • 327
  • 476

Does the FAA require the airlines to maintain continual communication with aircraft that can't be switched off?

No, there is no such requirement for radios, they can be switched off, they can fail, and propagation conditions may not allow to establish a radio link using terrestrial networks.

Every 10 seconds, the aircraft should report very basic parameters like position, altitude, speed, heading, engine power, and fuel. You can put all that into a single IP packet. Surely this must have occurred to someone? Are the airlines resisting

  • At the time of MH370 it was already possible using satcom and ACARS. ACARS can report a status using VHF or satcom. Satcom is used when overflying areas without VHF ground stations (desert, ocean).

  • MH370 had a satcom equipement to use ACARS, but didn't pay for the subscription, so they were not able to transmit ACARS when remote of VHF stations.

  • Why the subscription wasn't paid is likely because this would increase the ticket price, something passengers don't want, so airlines are indeed reluctant.

  • Nevertheless, considering the huge cost of Search and Rescue operations for MH370 and AF447, States are asking for the generalization of a space ATC. In space ATC communications with ATC can be done by multiple means, including satellites.

  • Space ATC is currently under preparation, but some elements are already deployed, e.g. the position can be reported from nearly everywhere using space-based ADS-B:

    Aircraft equipped with ADS-B can stream their exact position and altitude twice per second, wherever they are in the world, to a network of 66 satellites.

    Source: Space-based ADS-B helps NAV CANADA reach new safety milestone.

    If we are able to follow aircraft overflying oceans and desert areas on flight tracking sites, this is because they continuously report their position using a satellite and space ADS-B.

This question is recurrent under multiple forms, focusing on different aspects, so this overview is already refined in:

Does the FAA require the airlines to maintain continual communication with aircraft that can't be switched off?

No, there is no such requirement for radios, they can be switched off, they can fail, and propagation conditions may not allow to establish a radio link using terrestrial networks.

Every 10 seconds, the aircraft should report very basic parameters like position, altitude, speed, heading, engine power, and fuel. You can put all that into a single IP packet. Surely this must have occurred to someone? Are the airlines resisting

  • At the time of MH370 it was already possible using satcom and ACARS. ACARS can report a status using VHF or satcom. Satcom is used when overflying areas without VHF ground stations (desert, ocean).

  • MH370 had a satcom equipement to use ACARS, but didn't pay for the subscription, so they were not able to transmit ACARS when remote of VHF stations.

  • Why the subscription wasn't paid is likely because this would increase the ticket price, something passengers don't want, so airlines are indeed reluctant.

  • Nevertheless, considering the huge cost of Search and Rescue operations for MH370 and AF447, States are asking for the generalization of a space ATC. In space ATC communications with ATC can be done by multiple means, including satellites.

  • Space ATC is currently under preparation, but some elements are already deployed, e.g. the position can be reported from nearly everywhere using space-based ADS-B:

    Aircraft equipped with ADS-B can stream their exact position and altitude twice per second, wherever they are in the world, to a network of 66 satellites.

    Source: Space-based ADS-B helps NAV CANADA reach new safety milestone.

This question is recurrent under multiple forms, focusing on different aspects, so this overview is already refined in:

Does the FAA require the airlines to maintain continual communication with aircraft that can't be switched off?

No, there is no such requirement for radios, they can be switched off, they can fail, and propagation conditions may not allow to establish a radio link using terrestrial networks.

Every 10 seconds, the aircraft should report very basic parameters like position, altitude, speed, heading, engine power, and fuel. You can put all that into a single IP packet. Surely this must have occurred to someone? Are the airlines resisting

  • At the time of MH370 it was already possible using satcom and ACARS. ACARS can report a status using VHF or satcom. Satcom is used when overflying areas without VHF ground stations (desert, ocean).

  • MH370 had a satcom equipement to use ACARS, but didn't pay for the subscription, so they were not able to transmit ACARS when remote of VHF stations.

  • Why the subscription wasn't paid is likely because this would increase the ticket price, something passengers don't want, so airlines are indeed reluctant.

  • Nevertheless, considering the huge cost of Search and Rescue operations for MH370 and AF447, States are asking for the generalization of a space ATC. In space ATC communications with ATC can be done by multiple means, including satellites.

  • Space ATC is currently under preparation, but some elements are already deployed, e.g. the position can be reported from nearly everywhere using space-based ADS-B:

    Aircraft equipped with ADS-B can stream their exact position and altitude twice per second, wherever they are in the world, to a network of 66 satellites.

    Source: Space-based ADS-B helps NAV CANADA reach new safety milestone.

    If we are able to follow aircraft overflying oceans and desert areas on flight tracking sites, this is because they continuously report their position using a satellite and space ADS-B.

This question is recurrent under multiple forms, focusing on different aspects, so this overview is already refined in:

added 690 characters in body
Source Link
mins
  • 81.2k
  • 30
  • 327
  • 476

Does the FAA require the airlines to maintain continual communication with aircraft that can't be switched off?

No, there is no such requirement for radios, they can be switched off, they can fail, and propagation conditions may not allow to establish a radio link using terrestrial networks.

Every 10 seconds, the aircraft should report very basic parameters like position, altitude, speed, heading, engine power, and fuel. You can put all that into a single IP packet. Surely this must have occurred to someone? Are the airlines resisting

  • At the time of MH370 it was already possible using satcom and ACARS. ACARS can report a status using VHF or satcom. Satcom is used when overflying areas without VHF ground stations (desert, ocean).

  • MH370 had a satcom equipement to use ACARS, but didn't pay for the subscription, so they were not able to transmit ACARS when remote of VHF stations.

  • Why the subscription wasn't paid is likely because this would increase the ticket price, something passengers don't want, so airlines are indeed reluctant.

  • Nevertheless, considering the huge cost of Search and Rescue operations for MH370 and AF447, States are asking for the generalization of a space ATC. In space ATC communications with ATC can be done by multiple means, including satellites.

  • Space ATC is currently under preparation, but some elements are already deployed, e.g. the position can be reported from nearly everywhere using space-based ADS-B:

    Aircraft equipped with ADS-B can stream their exact position and altitude twice per second, wherever they are in the world, to a network of 66 satellites.

    Source: Space-based ADS-B helps NAV CANADA reach new safety milestone.

This question is recurrent under multiple forms, focusing on different aspects, so this overview is already refined in:

Does the FAA require the airlines to maintain continual communication with aircraft that can't be switched off?

No, there is no such requirement for radios, they can be switched off.

Every 10 seconds, the aircraft should report very basic parameters like position, altitude, speed, heading, engine power, and fuel. You can put all that into a single IP packet. Surely this must have occurred to someone? Are the airlines resisting

  • At the time of MH370 it was already possible using satcom and ACARS. ACARS can report a status using VHF or satcom. Satcom is used when overflying areas without VHF ground stations (desert, ocean).

  • MH370 had a satcom equipement to use ACARS, but didn't pay for the subscription, so they were not able to transmit ACARS when remote of VHF stations.

  • Why the subscription wasn't paid is likely because this would increase the ticket price, something passengers don't want, so airlines are indeed reluctant.

  • Nevertheless, considering the huge cost of Search and Rescue operations for MH370 and AF447, States are asking for the generalization of a space ATC. In space ATC communications with ATC can be done by multiple means, including satellites.

  • Space ATC is currently under preparation, but some elements are already deployed, e.g. the position can be reported from nearly everywhere using space-based ADS-B:

    Aircraft equipped with ADS-B can stream their exact position and altitude twice per second, wherever they are in the world, to a network of 66 satellites.

    Source: Space-based ADS-B helps NAV CANADA reach new safety milestone.

This question is recurrent under multiple forms, focusing on different aspects, so this overview is already refined in:

Does the FAA require the airlines to maintain continual communication with aircraft that can't be switched off?

No, there is no such requirement for radios, they can be switched off, they can fail, and propagation conditions may not allow to establish a radio link using terrestrial networks.

Every 10 seconds, the aircraft should report very basic parameters like position, altitude, speed, heading, engine power, and fuel. You can put all that into a single IP packet. Surely this must have occurred to someone? Are the airlines resisting

  • At the time of MH370 it was already possible using satcom and ACARS. ACARS can report a status using VHF or satcom. Satcom is used when overflying areas without VHF ground stations (desert, ocean).

  • MH370 had a satcom equipement to use ACARS, but didn't pay for the subscription, so they were not able to transmit ACARS when remote of VHF stations.

  • Why the subscription wasn't paid is likely because this would increase the ticket price, something passengers don't want, so airlines are indeed reluctant.

  • Nevertheless, considering the huge cost of Search and Rescue operations for MH370 and AF447, States are asking for the generalization of a space ATC. In space ATC communications with ATC can be done by multiple means, including satellites.

  • Space ATC is currently under preparation, but some elements are already deployed, e.g. the position can be reported from nearly everywhere using space-based ADS-B:

    Aircraft equipped with ADS-B can stream their exact position and altitude twice per second, wherever they are in the world, to a network of 66 satellites.

    Source: Space-based ADS-B helps NAV CANADA reach new safety milestone.

This question is recurrent under multiple forms, focusing on different aspects, so this overview is already refined in:

added 690 characters in body
Source Link
mins
  • 81.2k
  • 30
  • 327
  • 476
Loading
added 690 characters in body
Source Link
mins
  • 81.2k
  • 30
  • 327
  • 476
Loading
added 690 characters in body
Source Link
mins
  • 81.2k
  • 30
  • 327
  • 476
Loading
Source Link
mins
  • 81.2k
  • 30
  • 327
  • 476
Loading