Timeline for Why is higher V1 preferred over lower V1 in takeoff performance calculations?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S Mar 4 at 6:20 | vote | accept | alQ | ||
| S Mar 4 at 6:20 | vote | accept | alQ | ||
| S Mar 4 at 6:20 | |||||
| Mar 4 at 6:20 | vote | accept | alQ | ||
| S Mar 4 at 6:20 | |||||
| Feb 26 at 8:28 | answer | added | busdriver | timeline score: 3 | |
| Feb 26 at 5:02 | answer | added | John K | timeline score: 2 | |
| Feb 26 at 4:38 | comment | added | JZYL | It depends on whose point of view. From an engineer's POV, lower V1 (in relation to Vr) improves the takeoff field performance, which in turn makes the plane more enticing. From a pilot's POV, given a fixed runway distance, higher V1 means the abort can be delayed as much. | |
| Feb 26 at 3:52 | history | asked | alQ | CC BY-SA 4.0 |