The difference here isn't between ships and aircraft: it's between Morse code and voice.
The SOS signal is only for Morse code. It's short, easy to send, and easy to recognise. But it's not as convenient to say. It doesn't actually mean "save our souls". The letters were chosen just to form the simple Morse pattern, and "save our souls" is a backformation: ...
According to Wikipedia:
The pronunciation of the digits 3, 4, 5, and 9 differs from standard English – being pronounced tree, fower, fife, and niner. The digit 3 is specified as tree so that it is not pronounced sri; the long pronunciation of 4 (still found in some English dialects) keeps it somewhat distinct from for; 5 is pronounced with a second "f" ...
The primary reason is probably that it ensures there is no confusion between passengers, crew, or infants. Technically, "passengers" is the number of seats occupied, "crew" is both the pilots and flight attendants on duty. So any small children brought on as "lap children" will not be included in the "passengers" count, but should be included in the total ...
You report unable, and ATC will come up with a different plan.
To provide some context: If I ask you to expedite a vertical manoeuvre, it is probably because you are on crossing tracks with another aircraft, and I want you to pass them either above or below. This could be to meet certain level restrictions, or simply because I want to provide you with ...
The word "Takeoff" should only be used when clearing somebody for takeoff, acknowledging your takeoff clearance, or cancelling/acknowledging a cancelled takeoff clearance.
"Departure" should be used in all other circumstances, and as far as I'm aware whoever told you you could use the word Takeoff for VFR was wrong.
Anybody saying the word "takeoff" ...
I'm guessing you're referring to a clip such as this one. JFK ground is just being a bit informal and fun (as you can tell from the rest of the clip) with their instructions. Although it isn't mentioned, the controller is probably referring to a business jet flight, such as ExecJet.
The "top 1%" refers to a ranking based on income, specifically those not in ...
This wording comes from the common meaning of letter C to be Correct/Yes, early standardized and used at sea since 1857. Under the Commercial Code of Signals (1857-1902), the C flag, in addition of representing the letter itself, had the meaning of Yes/Affirmative. This code has been improved and extended into the International Code of Signals (...
Generally when used in ATC movement instructions the word "company" means "The other aircraft operated by your company".
In this context it's a convenient shorthand for controllers and pilots: If two aircraft from the same operator are going to the same place on the airport (one may be told "Follow company"), or to assist with visual separation and ...
The most obvious thing to me would be to just talk to them:
Medevac 123, this is the Diamond on base for 31, do you need to expedite your departure?
If they say no, then just continue and land as normal. If they say yes, then I'd get out of their way:
Medevac 123, roger, we'll extend our base and fly a wide upwind to let you out
I wouldn't worry ...
It means you've been allocated a block altitude - you can fly whatever altitude you want between 7000 ft and 8000 ft.
Typically this would be something you'd request, e.g. to practice unusual attitude recovery or to avoid having to hold a hard altitude in mountain wave. It's unusual for ATC to volunteer a block altitude without the pilot asking for it, but ...
In civil aviation the ICAO standard phraseology should be used. This phraseology is described in ICAO document 9432.
The standard ICAO phraseology is to use the word report in the first case.
According to the definitions it means: "Pass me the following information ..."
[callsign] report heading
The second phrase is even stranger. QNE is the standard ...
Honestly? It's probably because they heard someone else do it, and thought it sounded cool (or otherwise just got it stuck in their head).
You're 100% right - saying the runway name is, if slightly longer, certainly a bit more informative. It's the kind of thing that can help arriving pilots know which runway is in use, keeping later radio clutter ("Um, uhh,...
The "Approaching Minimums" callout is made by the Pilot Monitoring (or, in some cases equipment, the GPWS -- Ground Proximity Warning System) as the aircraft is descending on an instrument approach and has reached an altitude 100 feet above the minimums for that approach -- the Decision Altitude (DA -- typically used for a Cat I ILS, and set as XXX' MSL) or ...
A vector is defined by a direction and magnitude. In aviation these represent your heading (the direction) and your speed (the magnitude). However, in normal aviation usage "vector" only refers to the heading and other nomenclature is used to assign/report speeds.
"Jetlink 1234, Cleveland Center, turn left heading 250 for traffic"
In which case ...
When instructed to report something.
ATC: Cimber 626 turn left heading 120, cleared ILS approach runway 09, report established
Pilot: Heading left 120, cleared ILS approach runway 09, WILCO, Cimber 626
ATC: OYABC airborne time 33, report passing Dalhem
Pilot; (Roger), WILCO, OYABC
ATC: Lufthansa 135, traffic is a Boeing 737 on 5 miles ...
I have never heard "tally ho" used in civilian aviation and it not a recognised phrase so should not be used. A civilian ATCO would not think positively about anyone using that phrase.
It used to be used in military comms in combat. Its usage arose during WW1 when the Royal Flying Corps (and later the Royal Air Force) drew its crews mostly from the "...
Runway 03 R would be pronounced as
Runway Zero Three Right
As ever, although British, I thoroughly recommend CAP 413 the UK's Radio Telephony manual:
It's mostly ICAO compliant and barring small differences, should contain plenty of ...
Yes, it is correct to use MAYDAY or PAN PAN PAN on the ground.
In recurrent training we are often reminded that in the case of a rejected takeoff in a foreign country it is important to use MAYDAY or PAN PAN PAN on the ground to avoid any confusion due to language difficulties.
It's probably a good idea at any airport as a disabled aircraft on a busy ...
Since you are already on flight following you are already in the system (ATC has a flight strip for you and a datablock on the radar). Just call ATC and ask them for IFR to your destination.
Austin Approach, Cessna 12345, request IFR to Austin
Since you have flight following ATC already knows your type, equipment suffix, location and altitude, so I ...
I agree with what fooot said. Also, I would add, as someone to volunteers in search & rescue (Civil Air Patrol) as a mission pilot, when you hear the word "souls," it adds some urgency and seriousness to the handling of any emergency. When an air traffic controller asks a pilot, during an emergency, for the number of souls on board, it communicates to ...
There is one example in the AIM used for transitioning from VFR to IFR, and it how I've always done it:
AIM 5-2-5. Abbreviated IFR Departure Clearance (Cleared … as Filed) Procedures
"Los Angeles center, Apache Six One Papa, VFR estimating Paso Robles VOR at three two, one thousand five hundred,
request IFR to Bakersfield."
I suspect there is no such rule. I looked at a few online sources - none mention the word apology (or variants).
ATC communication is expected to be short and follow a standard set of stock phrase forms.
Anything outside that is discouraged unless necessary to clarify instructions etc.
An FAA document "Radio Communications Phraseology and Techniques" ...
ICAO Annex 11 and Doc 4444 confirm the usage of Upper.
Airways are four groups per ICAO, the older group is A, B, G, and R. Those stand for Amber, Blue, Green, and Red. There are three other groups.
So an airway named UG1 will be called Upper Green (not Golf) One on the radio.
Example they give in Doc 4444:
N0450F310 L9 UL9 STU285036/M082F310 UL9 ...
Looking at the Glossary for Pilots and Air Traffic Services Personnel (TP 11958E) at the Government of Canada web site, the definitions of overshoot and go-around are
(1) To pass beyond the limit of the runway or landing field when
trying to land.
(2) Other expression for: go-around
"Approaching Minimums" you are about at your minimum descent altitude (MDA) or decision altitude (DA).
"Minimums" means you've arrived at that altitude.
Pilots use those phrases to alert the pilot flying when he us getting close to the ground. At minimums he will either have the runway environment in sight and decide to continue and land on the runway or ...
The phraseology was slightly incorrect, this is from the FAA's ATC Orders (section 3-10-5):
3−10−5. LANDING CLEARANCE
a. When issuing a clearance to land, first state the runway number followed by the landing clearance. If
the landing runway is changed, controllers must preface the landing
clearance with “Change to runway.”
Going around is a process, pulling up is an action. When ATC tells you to go around or you say you are going around it means you are initiating a set of actions to abort an approach. Pulling up is a single action, i.e. increasing the angle of attack in order to climb, and would be part of a go-around procedure.
Pull up is a non-standard phrase, in most ...
From the AOPA:
Flying into a Mode C Veil Without a Transponder
For flying into a Mode C veil without an operable transponder, the
pilot needs to telephone the appropriate radar facility for the Class
B airspace and ask for permission to make the flight. Upon agreeing to
conditions (including direction of flight and altitude), the pilot
Oddly enough, the FARs and the AIM do not define these terms even though they use them frequently, but it is in the Pilot Controller Glossary (see below). This is one of those areas that I've never really been given specific training on and I guess figured that I would "know it when I saw it". The definitions kind of support that since they leave it to the ...
"Request " is very common in Europe but it's usually the pilot who will use it to talk to ATC, as in "Request taxi" or "Request to enter your airspace".
I've never heard this phrase being used by a controller in Belgium, France and The Netherlands (where I've flown the most so far). Seems very odd to me.