Your daughter is right as explained here:
The 'bug-eyed' face of the parabrake door mounting the two
rear-hemisphere radar warning antennas.
So they do detect other airplanes and probably the smiles of their pilots too as they are getting close to the phantom.
Here's a photo:
Retired Lt. Col. Thomas Mudge, a ground controller for the 82nd Aerial Targets Squadron, remotely pilots a QF-4 during a Combat Archer mission May 12, 2015 at Tyndall Air Force Base, Fla.
QF-4s were retired in 2016. They are now flying the QF-16.
As several of the comments have mentioned, the F-4 have the option of folding the outermost section of their wings, as shown in the picture below.
The main purpose of this was simply to save precious space on aircraft carriers, it had no use when flying. There have been some incidents where wings have either started to fold during flight or where the pilot ...
The statement is accurate.
Here is a list of all U.S. Fighter Aircraft, in service and retired on Wikipedia. The following is an excerpt from that list for relevant aircraft.
F-4 Phantom (Air Force/Navy/Marines)
F-5 Freedom Fighter (Navy)
F-6 Skyray (Navy/Marines)
F-7 Sea Dart (Navy)
F-8 Crusader (Navy)
F-9 Cougar (Navy)
F-10 Skynight (Navy/Marines)
That's not an eyepiece, it's a glare shield. The angle of the display made it susceptible to glare from light entering the cockpit. The shield made it easier to see, at night as well. My theory is that they got the idea from Star Trek. Spock had one too on his workstation on the Enterprise. 🤣
In U.S. Navy and Marine Corps F-4 Phantoms, the wing fold mechanism was controlled and powered by hydraulics, since the pilot had to fold the wings after landing for taxiing around on the deck. The USAF versions of the Phantom, on the other hand, had this hydraulic capability removed, and there was a pin in the top of the wing, (if I recall), just inboard of ...
The F-4 radar was a low PRF pulse radar, designed to search for, acquire, and track other airborne aircraft, and then provide guidance for Aim-7 Sparrow air-to-air missiles. It also had a ground mapping capability, and a capability to detect and display severe weather, but it was primarily designed for air-to-air combat.
Later models of the F-4 had an more ...
The test was carried out by the Sandia National Laboratories under terms of a contract with the Muto Institute of Structural Mechanics, Inc., of Tokyo. The purpose of the test:
... was to determine the impact force, versus time, due to the impact, of a complete F-4 Phantom — including both engines — onto a massive, essentially rigid reinforced concrete ...
Farhan is correct that these "bug eyes" are part of the radar warning system, but unfortunately is incorrect as to what that system actually does.
Radar warning systems are commonly installed on military aircraft. Their primary purpose is to detect the upper-level radio frequencies employed by ground- and airborne-based active (i.e. radiation-emitting) ...
The Energy Maneuverability theory is primarily a conceptual design framework. Its role is to be a guideline in creating the requirements for your aircraft.
This is something well above the manufacturer's level of responsibility. The requirements are created by the buyer, like the US DoD; the manufacturer's job is to design a machine to meet them, with some ...
Can the pilot in the front seat control the weaponry as well, or do they only fly the aircraft?
Yes, the pilot in the front could control all weapons.
And can the weapons officer in the back fly in emergencies, like, pilot is unconscious or something?
This is more complicated. The USAF F-4's did not have controls for the RIO's (now called WSO's), but ...
Maybe not technically a fighter, but the A-1 Skyraider was (in different variants, like the F-4) also used by all services.
It was even used in air to air combat, shooting down at least one North Korean and one Chinese aircraft during the Korean war and several North Vietnamese MiGs during the Vietnam war.
Not sure if that makes it a fighter according to ...
The FJ Fury is actually a Navy/Marine derivative of the Air Force F-86 Sabre.
Variants of the Northrup F-5 were also used by all services, although mostly in adversary training roles. The A-7 was used by the Navy and Air Force, but I don't think the Marines ever flew them (fighter?).
And going back further, and in the non-fighter category, the B-24 had a ...