16
$\begingroup$

According to this discussion(2nd)(3rd) and this video there is more fuselage bending in turbulence on the Boeing 757 than on other Jets.

Why does the B757 fuselage bend more on turbulence? What are the factors related into fuselage bending? I always thought there is only fuselage bending during take-off and landing on tarmac.

757cab 757bend

Edit: Picture Zoomed, fuselage shows flexing.

$\endgroup$
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Other type of bending due to hard landing, worth a look: youtube.com/watch?v=S7pXjQ16f5c $\endgroup$ – TesterMen Tester Nov 27 '14 at 14:40
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ The YT vid looks much like when I try to lend in the FlightGear amateur simulator, and it looks pretty scary! $\endgroup$ – yo' Nov 27 '14 at 14:44
  • 6
    $\begingroup$ What is the arrow in your first picture supposed to indicate? $\endgroup$ – David Richerby Nov 27 '14 at 17:12
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ I'd rather have it flex than snap, personally. Maybe that's just me. Also, the line wrapping on the 'popular questions' list made me think fuselage and factors were a single word and I read "why 757 fuselage has more turbulent bacon" and was immediately interested. $\endgroup$ – corsiKa Nov 27 '14 at 20:18
  • 5
    $\begingroup$ how do you know from that video that it's the fuselage flexing and not the seats/floor panels? $\endgroup$ – Johnny Nov 27 '14 at 20:26
27
$\begingroup$

This is really two questions

  1. Why does a fuselage bend?
  2. Why does the 757 fuselage bend more than others

I'll give the simple answers here. You can go into a LOT of detail, but the detailed answers are mainly just bringing more information on design/engineering differences into the simple answers (eg composites bend/break in a different way to aluminium)

Why does a fuselage bend?

Essentially, it's because the lifting force doesn't support the entire fuselage equally. Drag and the aerodynamic forces created by the fuselage itself will also affect things, but it's mainly due to the fact that the lifting force is centred on two points of the fuselage, while the weight is spread along it

The lift is generated, primarily, in two places: the wings and the horizontal stabiliser (some is generated in the body too, but relatively little). Most of that lift is generated at the wings, which are attached in the middle(-ish) of the fuselage. Imagine balancing a ruler (fuselage) on your finger (wings), then stacking coins along the top of the ruler. The heavier the rule, and the more "lift" your finger has to provide, the more the ruler flexes.

Of course, lift isn't constant - turbulence means that over a few second the lift provided by the wings can change quite a lot. Imagine you start bouncing your finger up and down, creating "turbulence": the ruler will flex and unflex as it absorbs that changing force. This is the fuselage flex seen in aircraft.

The fuselage will also bend while landing or taking off, because you're again changing how the weight of the fuselage is supported: the weight is transferred from the wing root/spar to the landing gear. And the final obvious one is that the weight of the aircraft changes during the flight due to fuel burn etc.

Why does the 757 flex more than other airliners?

Well, for one thing I don't see any sources for this other than "I've heard that" (the links you provided are mostly hear-say too), but I have seen it stated as fact. Let's, for the moment, assume it's fact... the theory applies regardless.

The 757 will flex more than some other airliners (although likely less than some others) because of its design, construction and the build materials. The simplest explanation is that it's one of the longest narrow-body airliners.

What does that mean? Well, it means it's one of the longest, thinnest fuselages around. This gives us two causes:

  1. The 757 flexes more than other large airliners because anything bigger than it is a wide-body aircraft, which will resist bending more than a small, narrow bodied thin one
  2. It flexes more than other small airliners because any other narrow body is lighter and shorter than the 757, providing less force on the fuselage and requiring a smaller lifting force.

TL;DR: Flex is caused by lift acting mostly in the middle(ish) of the fuselage, while the weight of the fuselage and other forces on it are spread out along the length.

Overall, then, the 757 is on the boundary between lighter, narrow bodied aircraft and larger, wide bodied ones. Anything smaller than it weighs less so stresses the narrow body less. Anything larger has a bigger, stronger fuselage.

$\endgroup$
16
$\begingroup$

First, there is no fuselage bending to be seen in the linked movie. What might look like flexing is actually the seats and the interior panels moving due to inertial forces. In turbulent weather the aircraft will be shaken by gusts, and this causes the movement between seats and panels.

Second, in the picture the flaps are in take-off, shifting the center of lift aft, and the tail pushes the nose up, so it needs to create a considerable downforce. This is transferred via the rear fuselage to trim the moments of wing lift and weight, which attacks at the center of gravity. See the sketch below; blue are aerodynamic forces and red the stresses in the fuselage.

enter image description here

Your enlarged picture shows buckling of the lower rear fuselage panels. This is normal behavior under stress and enables them to take higher loads. When a plate is stressed, it first deforms in-plane, but when compression loads exceed a critical value, the plate responds by buckling out-of-plane. The sketch below shows the general relation between stress and strain.

enter image description here

For the 757 flexing more than other airplanes: Maybe this has to do with the slender forward fuselage. This leads to more flexing at the same strain in the aluminum panels. The rear fuselage is higher to accommodate more baggage. During development Boeing engineers were afraid that directional stability might be insufficient with a higher forward fuselage, so the cross section was restricted to that of a Boeing 737. But there are aircraft with even more slender fuselages like the MD-90 (see below). They should flex at least as much as the 757.

enter image description here

Any aircraft part will flex when subjected to stresses, and the fuselage is no exception. Especially the forward part will create lift and side force during flight, its own mass will cause it to bend down the more you move away from the wings, especially when subjected to g-forces, and tail-mounted control surface deflections will add more stress and bending, like in your picture. Fuselage flexing is actually severe enough that in flight test the fuselage will carry inertial sensors at several locations to collect enough data.

$\endgroup$
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Note that (hopefully), the fuselage itself will never go into buckling mode, but will only be stressed in the linear part of the stress-strain diagram. The only things buckling are the decorative panels. $\endgroup$ – Sanchises Feb 2 '15 at 19:10
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ @sanchises: Those panels take shear loads and help the (indeed hopefully non-buckling) longerons to be loaded with compression and tension loads. They are an integral part of the load-carrying structure! $\endgroup$ – Peter Kämpf Feb 2 '15 at 21:46

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.