Why does a shockwave move further towards the trailing edge with increasing camber?
Also, is the shockwave the thing above the aerofoil or behind it?
Aviation Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for aircraft pilots, mechanics, and enthusiasts. It only takes a minute to sign up.
Sign up to join this communityWhy does a shockwave move further towards the trailing edge with increasing camber?
Also, is the shockwave the thing above the aerofoil or behind it?
The increased curvature of the higher camber at the end of the airfoil will keep the speed on the upper side high. As a consequence, there is little deceleration which would force a shock.
Remember that a shock in transsonic flow is the forceful ending of a supersonic pocket of air. It will be delayed until the rising pressure of the decelerating surrounding and still subsonic air makes it inevitable. Within the shock the flow accelerates in order to fill the space vacated by the thinning airfoil contour (see here for a more complete explanation) and outside of it it decelerates. That cannot last forever, but adding camber will stabilize the supersonic pocket by adding a suction area over the highly curved contour which keeps the air from decelerating as early as it does for the uncambered version.
The same, btw, happens with a downward deflected flap, because the kink in the contour at the hinge point also creates a local suction peak.
is the shockwave the thing above the aerofoil or behind it?
The shock lies in the thin line separating the dark red and green areas on the upper side of the airfoil. Its strength is proportional to the inclination of that line, i.e. it is strongest near the surface. It is, however, spread out into a triangle from the interaction between the boundary layer and the shock which makes it look like the greek letter $\lambda$, hence the name Lambda shock. This is typical for transsonic flow.
Sorry if one of the new writers is acting up a bit, but the question does bring some interesting aspects of airfoil design into play.
Firstly, the use of a slightly lowered trailing edge can be used to improve airflow over the upper wing by creating lower pressure behind the wing. This will increase the lift coefficient with slightly more drag$^2$. Nothing new there. 172 operators know it as "Flaps 10".
Why it is so important to understand this in the trans sonic realm has much more to do with controlling pitch tendencies, as the center of pressure changes, due to Mach effects.
Supercritical wings are designed to minimize, not increase, wing camber due to a phenomena known as "tuck", which can lead to an unrecoverable dive. Tops of these wings are "flattened" to minimize shockwave formation.
The lift generation comes more from the bottom front, with undercamber in the back to balance the center of pressure. These wings literally "surf" along on bottom pressure, not unlike their sea side counterparts$^1$.
So, from a practical point of view, that is why undercamber is seen in supercritical wings.
$^1$this is why slats and flaps are so valuable when big airliners slow down to lower Mach speeds. Supercritical wings more closely resemble an inverted classic airfoil. Not surprisingly, these also make for a fairly good hypersonic lifting body design.
$^2$ this is why flaps can be retracted for better climbing performance - climbing is done with excess thrust. (thrust available - drag)