In CAT II and CAT III Approach Charts, the Jeppesen version of charts depicts both the "DH" and the "RA".
And, I found out that they are somewhat different.
So, why do these differences occur?
Averagely about 2 ~ 3 ft deviations are existing.
Aviation Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for aircraft pilots, mechanics, and enthusiasts. It only takes a minute to sign up.
Sign up to join this communityIn CAT II and CAT III Approach Charts, the Jeppesen version of charts depicts both the "DH" and the "RA".
And, I found out that they are somewhat different.
So, why do these differences occur?
Averagely about 2 ~ 3 ft deviations are existing.
This entry is defined in the Jeppesen Charts Legend as follows:
The difference between radio altimeter (RA) and decision height (DH) is the different baseline. The radio altimeter will measure height above ground (directly below you) whereas the decision height uses the runway as a baseline. I made a sketch to illustrate the difference with the numbers of the example above:
It is usually not an issue for CAT III because at a typical DH of 50' you are already above the runway threshold on a normal glideslope (and for no DH it obviously doesn't apply). For CAT II with a typical DH of 100' there could be sloping terrain in front of the runway, but typically not much, that is why you see only a few feet difference. If there is a steep slope or a ditch in front of the runway, radar reflectors can be used to imitate a flat surface as shown in this related answer.
This example from Munich (EDDM) shows the RA entry only for the CAT II: