2
$\begingroup$

FAR 91.171 allows a pilot to use independent VORs to do the VOR check as opposed to using a testing facility. The reg says as long as they are within 4 degrees of each other the pilot is good to go. But why do they allow this? What if they were both within 4 degrees of each other but both were also off about 45 degrees when actually tuning to a VOR. It seems like using the dual VOR check tests the precision relative to another unit but not the actual accuracy of the system.

$\endgroup$
2
  • 4
    $\begingroup$ Not a mathematician, but I'd guess there are some probability calculations involved. Two independent units both being 45 degrees off, yet within 4 degrees of each other seems extremely unlikely. $\endgroup$ Dec 23, 2022 at 1:50
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Remember that what you are testing is not “the system” but only your receivers. The VORs themselves are continuously monitored and kept in precise calibration. You are testing two receivers that share no common components save for power supply. A bit of trivia; VORs do not work at all the way they are described in pilot training. There’s no “fixed pulse” and series of rotating pulses that arrive at different times. It’s actually two continuous radio waves that arrive out of phase, creating a third “net” frequency when compared. That discrete frequency equates to a radial. $\endgroup$
    – Max R
    Dec 23, 2022 at 3:35

1 Answer 1

2
$\begingroup$

You're correct that a dual check does not directly assess the accuracy of either of the individual systems to the true radial the aircraft is located on.

However, the probability that your example of both of them being in error by 45 degrees and also within 4 degrees of each other at the same time is improbable. It is likely that the FAA has examined the risk associated with the different methods of verifying the VOR's accuracy and determined that this is an acceptable risk due to the low chance of such a scenario coming to fruition.

It's important to remember that each VOR is a separate system, and they do not share common receivers.

$\endgroup$

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .