Here's yet another installment of "how fun it is to parse NOTAM". ;-)
Statements like "END PART 2 OF 2" are quite common in the E) item of NOTAM, however, the following has triggered a red light on my parser:
D3616/22 NOTAMN
Q) EDGG/QRTCA/IV/BO /W /000/100/5003N00804E012
A) EDGG PART 2 OF 2 B) 2211160800 C) 2211181800
D) NOV 16 0800-2200, NOV 17 0500-2200, NOV 18 0500-1800
E) - FLTS CONDUCTED ENTIRELY UNDER IFR DEP/DEST FRANKFURT/MAIN EDDF,
FRANKFURT-HAHN EDFH AND RAMSTEIN ETAR (CHANGE PROCEDURES ARE NOT
ALLOWED) WHICH FULFIL THE ICAO STANDARDS LAID DOWN IN ANNEX 17
(SAFEGUARDING INTERNATIONAL CIVIL AVIATION AGAINST ACTS OF UNLAWFUL
INTERFERENCE) OR REGULATION (EC) NO. 300-2008 OF THE EUROPEAN
PARLIAMENT AND THE COUNCIL OF 11 MARCH 2008. THE TERM -CHANGE
PROCEDURES- REFERS TO ALL FLTS THAT ARE CONDUCTED WHOLLY OR PARTLY
UNDER VISUAL FLIGHT RULES (Y AND Z FLIGHT PLANS).
TRAINING FLIGHTS, PHOTO AND CALIBRATION FLIGHTS (INCLUDING UNDER
INSTRUMENT FLIGHT RULES) ARE NOT ALLOWED.
PRIOR ENTERING, LEAVING OR TRANSITING THE AIRSPACE ALL AUTHORISED VFR
FLTS SHALL REPORT TO THE POLICE OF HESSEN. THE PROCEDURES TO BE USED
FOR THIS WILL BE COMMUNICATED BY THE POLICE VIA THE APPROPRIATE
CHANNELS. ALL AUTHORISED VFR FLTS SHALL MAINTAIN CONTINUOUS
AIR-GROUND VOICE COMMUNICATION WATCH ON FREQ 135.600MHZ (POLICE INFO)
WHILE FLYING WITHIN THE RESTRICTED AREA. CROSSING APPROVAL IN
CONJUNCTION WITH SECTION 17 LUFTVO WILL NOT BE GRANTED.
F) GND G) FL100
END PART 2 OF 2
CREATED: 15 Nov 2022 15:42:00
SOURCE: EUECYIYN
In this case it's not part of the E) item, but squeezed in after the G) item and the meta data CREATED and SOURCE.
There is no mention of "END PART" in Doc 8126, so the only place I see it fit is the free form E) item. However, after grepping a few thousand NOTAM, I couldn't find another example which contains both "END PART" and a G) item.
I assume, it's been misplaced in this case. Am I right?
Thanks for your help!